My wife and I have just bought a second floor apartment in an 1850s built Victorian house. We had a structural survey done before we moved in and specifically asked the engineer to check the floor substructure - since we wished to move the kitchen into what is currently the living room.
He did and in his report he mentioned the joists were 175x65m at 400mm centres and that it would be fine to support the weight of a a kitchen. The room is 5.5m x 4.5m with the joists running 5.5m span.
Since moving in we have increasingly noticed that the floor sags towards the middle and has some bounce - when you walk around the floor, bottles in the corner of the room rattle together... I have been searching the internet recently and it looks to me that the joists are undersized, which is typical of this type of property.
My question is:
1) should the structural engineer not have mentioned the sag or bounce in his report? And was he right to say that the joist size is fine?
2) if we wanted to level and stabilise the floor would the best way be Sistering the joists? If so would you use the same size timber or larger?
Thanks for you advice in advance...
He did and in his report he mentioned the joists were 175x65m at 400mm centres and that it would be fine to support the weight of a a kitchen. The room is 5.5m x 4.5m with the joists running 5.5m span.
Since moving in we have increasingly noticed that the floor sags towards the middle and has some bounce - when you walk around the floor, bottles in the corner of the room rattle together... I have been searching the internet recently and it looks to me that the joists are undersized, which is typical of this type of property.
My question is:
1) should the structural engineer not have mentioned the sag or bounce in his report? And was he right to say that the joist size is fine?
2) if we wanted to level and stabilise the floor would the best way be Sistering the joists? If so would you use the same size timber or larger?
Thanks for you advice in advance...