Does anyone in here have an electric (wet) boiler (i.e. plumbed into a standard Y plan system)?
If so, can I ask roughly what size property you have and what your 'leccy bills are? (If that's not too personal a question )
The reason I ask is that we are in the middle of an extension and need a new boiler and up 'till yesterday it was pretty cut and dry that we were going to install a new condensing oil boiler. (There's no mains gas to property)
But our plumber's suggested fitting a 12wk electric boiler instead and claims that he's done at least three of them in our town (Frome) and that each customer has claimed a reduction in fuel costs!?! (one customer was oil, another one lpg/propane I believe).
Now I know if you run the numbers purely on BTUs/Kw for kerosene and electric and figure in 92% efficiency of an oil boiler that electric works out around twice as expensive as oil. But I'm wondering if the combination of combusting oil/heat exchange/exhaust heat/boiler cycling (starting and stopping the burner to mainting the water at 80deg) can possibly lead to a complete system (boiler) that can put anywhere near 92% of the energy of the kerosene in to the circulating water?
On the other hand the 'leccy boiler is direct in the circulating water and except for losses due to do resistance it is as near to 100% efficient as possible. (second law of thermo and all that)
Can you see my dilemma? Please chirp in with any definitive answers or especially if you have a wet electric boiler yourself!
If so, can I ask roughly what size property you have and what your 'leccy bills are? (If that's not too personal a question )
The reason I ask is that we are in the middle of an extension and need a new boiler and up 'till yesterday it was pretty cut and dry that we were going to install a new condensing oil boiler. (There's no mains gas to property)
But our plumber's suggested fitting a 12wk electric boiler instead and claims that he's done at least three of them in our town (Frome) and that each customer has claimed a reduction in fuel costs!?! (one customer was oil, another one lpg/propane I believe).
Now I know if you run the numbers purely on BTUs/Kw for kerosene and electric and figure in 92% efficiency of an oil boiler that electric works out around twice as expensive as oil. But I'm wondering if the combination of combusting oil/heat exchange/exhaust heat/boiler cycling (starting and stopping the burner to mainting the water at 80deg) can possibly lead to a complete system (boiler) that can put anywhere near 92% of the energy of the kerosene in to the circulating water?
On the other hand the 'leccy boiler is direct in the circulating water and except for losses due to do resistance it is as near to 100% efficient as possible. (second law of thermo and all that)
Can you see my dilemma? Please chirp in with any definitive answers or especially if you have a wet electric boiler yourself!