I have a double socket in the bedroom and every time I turn the switches off for the tv I can hear a arcing noise from one of the switches so I plan on changing the socket but is it best to use a single or double pole socket and what's the best brand to buy.
It does not really normally matter whether you use SP (single pole) or DP (double pole). But in theory DP would be safer.
I use BG or click normally. But MK, Crabtree etc.. are fine.
I have a double socket in the bedroom and every time I turn the switches off for the tv I can hear a arcing noise from one of the switches so I plan on changing the socket but is it best to use a single or double pole socket and what's the best brand to buy.
Have a look and see how long the cables are behind the socket, and whether there's any slack that can be pulled through. Maybe post a photo.
Reason being that if they are very short and there is no slack then you might need to make sure you buy a socket with the terminals in the same places as the existing one if you are to be able to connect the wires.
I might, of course, be wrong, but I would be rather surprised if BS1363 allows a switched 13A socket to have a switch which is not able to safely (and without damage) break a highly inductive 13A load. Does anyone know?
Interesting. Thanks. I suppose the requirement for it to be able to break a "substantially non-inductive" current of 17A, means that it would able to break an "appreciably inductive" (but not necessarily 'highly inductive') one of 13A.
Why? It will miss all the overnight updates. Modern TVs take negligible power in standby and are meant to be left in standby to receive the updates. Most countries don't have switches on their sockets.
It is not the magnitude of the current being broken but the magnitude of the stored energy on the inductor when the current is broken and the back EMF created when the nagnetic field is collapsing. The resultant arc between the switch contacts is the main cause of contact wear and premature failure when supplying inductive loads
It is not the magnitude of the current being broken but the magnitude of the stored energy on the inductor when the current is broken and the back EMF created when the nagnetic field is collapsing.
Yes, but that's really just a play on words, since the 'magnitude of stored energy' (stored in magnetic field) is, itself, determined by the magnitude of the current.
In fact, since that stored energy is given by LI²/2, the fact that it is a function of I², rather than just I, means that the stored energy increases rapidly as current increases.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below,
or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Please select a service and enter a location to continue...
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local