A
Amateur99
Sorry if this repeats earlier questions, but have searched and found no answers.
Have just bought a new flat, top two floors of a 4-storey (inc basement) period conversion, which will have:
1. Ensuite drench-shower room with WC (2nd floor)
2. Family bathroom with shower and WC (2nd floor)
3. Cloakroom with WC (1st floor)
I see that these forums contain some fairly vitriolic debate on the relative merits of vented and unvented thermal stores, which has left me utterly confused on that score, and I don't want to reopen that debate.
My problem is that I want to be able to run two showers at the same time, in theory at least. I know from my current flat that a single combi boiler won't cope.
My friend tells me that he has installed a combi boiler with double the required capacity, and that as a result he is able to run two showers at the same time. Is this a sensible solution? From what I've read elsewhere on these forums, it sounds as though that's an inefficient approach that will lead to higher bills, though I don't quite see why as you'll still only ever be heating the water you actually use.
My second question is whether a combi is much more efficient than a heat store. Both the unvented (megaflo-style) solution and the vented thermal store (eg Gledhill Gulfstream) seem inefficient in principle as you are heating a large volume of water and then just leaving it there, or keeping it hot. On the other hand, apparently it's much better to heat a body of water in a single burn than to have the boiler coming on and off to heat water as required.
Can anybody offer a comparison of the efficiency (in terms of running costs) of combi vs thermal store? Can you quantify it (ie roughly how much will I save using one rather than the other)?
Thanks very much in advance for any help you can offer - I'm a bit lost with all this!
Have just bought a new flat, top two floors of a 4-storey (inc basement) period conversion, which will have:
1. Ensuite drench-shower room with WC (2nd floor)
2. Family bathroom with shower and WC (2nd floor)
3. Cloakroom with WC (1st floor)
I see that these forums contain some fairly vitriolic debate on the relative merits of vented and unvented thermal stores, which has left me utterly confused on that score, and I don't want to reopen that debate.
My problem is that I want to be able to run two showers at the same time, in theory at least. I know from my current flat that a single combi boiler won't cope.
My friend tells me that he has installed a combi boiler with double the required capacity, and that as a result he is able to run two showers at the same time. Is this a sensible solution? From what I've read elsewhere on these forums, it sounds as though that's an inefficient approach that will lead to higher bills, though I don't quite see why as you'll still only ever be heating the water you actually use.
My second question is whether a combi is much more efficient than a heat store. Both the unvented (megaflo-style) solution and the vented thermal store (eg Gledhill Gulfstream) seem inefficient in principle as you are heating a large volume of water and then just leaving it there, or keeping it hot. On the other hand, apparently it's much better to heat a body of water in a single burn than to have the boiler coming on and off to heat water as required.
Can anybody offer a comparison of the efficiency (in terms of running costs) of combi vs thermal store? Can you quantify it (ie roughly how much will I save using one rather than the other)?
Thanks very much in advance for any help you can offer - I'm a bit lost with all this!