Hi all - hoping to get a little more help...
Have established that we can use 120mm EPS with a compression strength of 70 kPa, to keep down cost of insulating the new kitchen extension floor, to obtain u-value required. This allows us space to put in 80mm floating concrete screed above.
If you were me would you get 120mm EPS for around £26 (from specialist manufacturers, or get the bog standard sizes from building yard - this would have to be two layers - one of 100mm, plus one of 25mm. This would give us a screed depth of 75mm (min required by build regs).
The reason I'm asking is that by using two layers the price would only by £16 for the two combined, and multiplied up would save us a few quid, but I'm concerned that floor would not be as stable, as there is the potential for more movement, and the screed would end up being a fraction thinner to boot. Would we be wise to reinforce (traditional not flowing) screed at this thickness?
Sorry for long rambling question!
many thanks in advance
Have established that we can use 120mm EPS with a compression strength of 70 kPa, to keep down cost of insulating the new kitchen extension floor, to obtain u-value required. This allows us space to put in 80mm floating concrete screed above.
If you were me would you get 120mm EPS for around £26 (from specialist manufacturers, or get the bog standard sizes from building yard - this would have to be two layers - one of 100mm, plus one of 25mm. This would give us a screed depth of 75mm (min required by build regs).
The reason I'm asking is that by using two layers the price would only by £16 for the two combined, and multiplied up would save us a few quid, but I'm concerned that floor would not be as stable, as there is the potential for more movement, and the screed would end up being a fraction thinner to boot. Would we be wise to reinforce (traditional not flowing) screed at this thickness?
Sorry for long rambling question!
many thanks in advance