- Joined
- 26 Jan 2017
- Messages
- 1,027
- Reaction score
- 65
- Country
No point in rushing the job if you are on a day rate with no fixed completion date.. eh?Not following your logic. How does origins of salary payment effect the time taken to negotiate?
No point in rushing the job if you are on a day rate with no fixed completion date.. eh?Not following your logic. How does origins of salary payment effect the time taken to negotiate?
Mmm sounds almost as appealing as french farmers force feeding geese or Bulgarian horse burgers.The UK has hardly any competent and experienced trade negotiators, and those we have are going to be fully occupied trying to sort out the Brexit disaster for the remainder of their working lives.
US trade negotiators (who are mostly recruited from the industries that will be doing the trading, so they can insist on whatever suits them best) are not used to actual negotiations. They are so big and powerful that they expect the other side to roll over and give in.
"Our usual approach is to fax them our terms and tell them to sign"
How do you think UK Agribusiness will cope if we have free trade for the US to flood us with hormone-enhanced factory milk, and cheap meat produced in inhumane conditions from growth-hormone-treated animals?
Are you suggesting negotiators are deliberately prolonging talks in an effort to get paid over a longer period? Surely that will apply to UK negotiators also? Do seriously think this is a reason trade deals take so long?No point in rushing the job if you are on a day rate with no fixed completion date.. eh?
Are you suggesting negotiators are deliberately prolonging talks in an effort to get paid over a longer period? Surely that will apply to UK negotiators also? Do seriously think this is a reason trade deals take so long?
part of the reason , snouts in trough
plus having 28 pencil pushing teams who then have to go back to national goverments and ask them etc etc
bunch of wasters tbh
Says the EU who put a time limit on discussions and were begging Theresa to start negotiations.
So what you and Corgifoxtrotoscarfireandice are saying is that in spite of the fact that a speedy negotiation would be hugely financially beneficial for the trading nations and in spite of the fact the negotiators are earning a salary irrespective of whether they are negotiating or not and that a speedy deal would likely mean financial bonuses for the negotiating team - they are prolonging it so that they can benefit by the square root of feck all?part of the reason , snouts in trough
There is nothing wrong with horse burgers.Mmm sounds almost as appealing as french farmers force feeding geese or Bulgarian horse burgers.
So what you and Corgifoxtrotoscarfireandice are saying is that in spite of the fact that a speedy negotiation would be hugely financially beneficial for the trading nations and in spite of the fact the negotiators are earning a salary irrespective of whether they are negotiating or not and that a speedy deal would likely mean financial bonuses for the negotiating team - they are prolonging it so that they can benefit by the square root of feck all?
Seems like the two of you have been drinking the RWR chalice again.
Says the EU who put a time limit on discussions and were begging Theresa to start negotiations.
I thought thats we were fighting against - the lack of democracy in the EU, how dare the country representatives go back to their own countries to ratify agreements.
"Do you expect me to talk Mr Juncker"I dare say the EU will now redouble their efforts to secure global domination
ihatemyjob is incapable of behaving like an adult