Hi all - I've got an extension nearing it's end that's being built by a local builder. The original plans had a pitched roof, but after realising the architect had not accounted for the right pitch roof actually fitting below the upstairs window, we had no option than to go for a flat roof. At the time the builder said it was around the same price after I had asked if it would save me money, but I've just had the final bill where he says the flat roof is a lot more work and materials and has charged an extra £1000 for a 3x4m extension. He was going to get a roofer in to do the pitched roof but did the flat roof himself. From what I can read a flat roof is meant to be cheaper, but are there circumstances that this sounds fair that anyone can think of, or do people smell something fishy? And yup I should have got things more tightly agreed, this has been a huge learning curve for me.
Thanks everyone!
Thanks everyone!