After a bit of help/advice regarding my existing concrete floor. Will try and pop some pictures up tomorrow if needed but here's the gist of it:
Our 1900's terrace had the wooden floor replaced with a concrete floor, due to some recent ongoing diy projects it appears that the concrete floor wasn't done right up to the walls. As such I have a couple of questions.
Firstly, would this have been done to possibly allow for any movement/expansion or is it more likely due to shrinkage when it was drying?
Secondly, this gap is filled so it bridges the floor to the wall. It's a very fine, powdery material. Quite dark but not soil if that makes sense, so I do wonder if it's from previous render from the walls or if it was deliberately filled.
We have had issues with the plaster at the bottom of the walls blowing and bulging, and judging by what i've discovered from removing some skirting it appears that the plaster on the walls has been done to the bottom of the floor and in most instances touching this powdery material. I know that doing the plaster down this low is a big no no so I have a plan but would like some advice on if it's the course of action.
Firstly, I plan to remove existing plaster from the floor up to around an inch or so up the wall, and if possible back to the brick.
Secondly, I am looking to remove as much of the material between the floor and wall so there is a bit of a gap. From what I can tell the existing slate DPC is less than an inch lower than the concrete floor so this powder material is potentially bridging the DPC.
Once i've removed the material, would it be ok to leave the gap or could it be filled with something else, and if so what would be suggested. I don't want an issue with cold or moisture coming up from the gap instead.
Sorry for the long post but I'm in the process of removing the skirting in a room that's having wooden flooring put down and I want to do a thorough job to rectify things as well as help the plasterer that would be coming in to repair some damage from the blown plaster.
Cheers
Our 1900's terrace had the wooden floor replaced with a concrete floor, due to some recent ongoing diy projects it appears that the concrete floor wasn't done right up to the walls. As such I have a couple of questions.
Firstly, would this have been done to possibly allow for any movement/expansion or is it more likely due to shrinkage when it was drying?
Secondly, this gap is filled so it bridges the floor to the wall. It's a very fine, powdery material. Quite dark but not soil if that makes sense, so I do wonder if it's from previous render from the walls or if it was deliberately filled.
We have had issues with the plaster at the bottom of the walls blowing and bulging, and judging by what i've discovered from removing some skirting it appears that the plaster on the walls has been done to the bottom of the floor and in most instances touching this powdery material. I know that doing the plaster down this low is a big no no so I have a plan but would like some advice on if it's the course of action.
Firstly, I plan to remove existing plaster from the floor up to around an inch or so up the wall, and if possible back to the brick.
Secondly, I am looking to remove as much of the material between the floor and wall so there is a bit of a gap. From what I can tell the existing slate DPC is less than an inch lower than the concrete floor so this powder material is potentially bridging the DPC.
Once i've removed the material, would it be ok to leave the gap or could it be filled with something else, and if so what would be suggested. I don't want an issue with cold or moisture coming up from the gap instead.
Sorry for the long post but I'm in the process of removing the skirting in a room that's having wooden flooring put down and I want to do a thorough job to rectify things as well as help the plasterer that would be coming in to repair some damage from the blown plaster.
Cheers