I have received two different quotes for redoing my flat roof (a 1970s townhouse with flat roof throughout). Both roofers are highly recommended -- one in the roofers association and one highly recommended by a friend who has used him on mulitiple occasions. The roof, including a converted garage area, is about 60 square metres.
Roofer no. 1's quote came to £4298 + a possible £1815 if the decking needed replacing, which he said he won't be able to see until he's stripped the roof. He said that the roof isn't asphalt.
Roofer no. 2 came to £4,200 all in, and he said that he was 100% sure that it is an asphalt roof and that therefore there isn't an issue with the decking. Does an asphalt roof not have decking on or do you think he's just willing to absorb the cost of the decking whereas no. 1 isn't??
When I went back to no. 1 he accepted that the roof was asphalt as the other guy was so sure.
I don't know which one to use. Roofer no. 1 can do it straight away while the weather is good, while no. 2 can't do it for about a month, so more water may come in (there is already a leak in one room). Also roofer no. 1 has insurance for hot works and to protect the public, don't know about no. 2.
I would really welcome any advice you can give me as am tossing and turning about this! Which quote sounds more sensible? I would like to use no. 1 but not if it works out to be far more expensive for no reason.
With many thanks for your help...
Roofer no. 1's quote came to £4298 + a possible £1815 if the decking needed replacing, which he said he won't be able to see until he's stripped the roof. He said that the roof isn't asphalt.
Roofer no. 2 came to £4,200 all in, and he said that he was 100% sure that it is an asphalt roof and that therefore there isn't an issue with the decking. Does an asphalt roof not have decking on or do you think he's just willing to absorb the cost of the decking whereas no. 1 isn't??
When I went back to no. 1 he accepted that the roof was asphalt as the other guy was so sure.
I don't know which one to use. Roofer no. 1 can do it straight away while the weather is good, while no. 2 can't do it for about a month, so more water may come in (there is already a leak in one room). Also roofer no. 1 has insurance for hot works and to protect the public, don't know about no. 2.
I would really welcome any advice you can give me as am tossing and turning about this! Which quote sounds more sensible? I would like to use no. 1 but not if it works out to be far more expensive for no reason.
With many thanks for your help...