I am going to have all the walls in the house repainted.
Almost all the walls have been lined and some have been wallpapered.
Where the lining is in s poor condition, the job will involve taking off the old lining paper before repainting.
The house is 1930s, with a 1980s extension, and I understand that the plaster whilst in good condition is a bit bumpy compared with modern plaster jobs. Also previous workmen have not always done a great job on making it flat.
Decorators who have been around to look at the house are recommending relining in places where the joins in the lining paper are obvious or where there are cracks in the plaster/lining paper/paint.
I was wondering roughly, how much more would it cost to skim the plaster and paint vis-a-vis reline and paint (as a ratio)?
Furthermore apart from the fact that a skimmed wall, should in principle, look better than a relined wall, is there any other benefit to having a skimmed wall? I.e. will it last longer?
Almost all the walls have been lined and some have been wallpapered.
Where the lining is in s poor condition, the job will involve taking off the old lining paper before repainting.
The house is 1930s, with a 1980s extension, and I understand that the plaster whilst in good condition is a bit bumpy compared with modern plaster jobs. Also previous workmen have not always done a great job on making it flat.
Decorators who have been around to look at the house are recommending relining in places where the joins in the lining paper are obvious or where there are cracks in the plaster/lining paper/paint.
I was wondering roughly, how much more would it cost to skim the plaster and paint vis-a-vis reline and paint (as a ratio)?
Furthermore apart from the fact that a skimmed wall, should in principle, look better than a relined wall, is there any other benefit to having a skimmed wall? I.e. will it last longer?