I have bought a house built in 1900 and am due to complete shortly. I had a survey done and the surveyor noted that there was some low level damp which i should have investigated. he also mentioned that there was insufficient sub floor ventilation which could be the root cause and installation of air bricks may resolve the issue. Additionally the house has been empty for 8 months with no heating, furniture against the walls, etc.
Some of the walls appear very slightly damp, but it has paper on so it's hard to tell. Also the paper is very old and the house is very cold as it went through winter with no heating. There is a very small amount of damp in the flooring, which I have been advised by two people could relatively easily be repaired by a carpenter cutting out and fixing the joist.
My dilemma is whether to believe the two damp proof companies who have bee out who have advised that I have 1 m of plaster removed, chemicals injected and then 3 layers of sand and cement/plaster with additives. Now if I go down this route I will remove the plaster myself (is it best to hire a bit of kit from a tool hire place to help with this?) and will have my own plasterer do the repairs, employing the damp proof company to just do the injections. Their prices for plastering were outrageous.
However I have spent hours reading about rising damp and have also had advice from a friend who assesses houses for the council (not a surveyor or damp expert) and he believes that the only damp is caused by condensation and the lack of sub floor ventilation. If I went with this assumption and got the minor repairs to the flooring and installed air bricks then I would save myself a huge amount of work, inconvenience and money. However I want to live in this house for the rest of my life, so want to get it right. I want to get it right, but not do work I don't need to do.
Based on my description what are your initial thoughts. Secondly where can I find the details of independent experts who do not work for damp proofing companies? I live 25 mins north of Bath, just into Wiltshire.
Many thanks for any assistance.
Some of the walls appear very slightly damp, but it has paper on so it's hard to tell. Also the paper is very old and the house is very cold as it went through winter with no heating. There is a very small amount of damp in the flooring, which I have been advised by two people could relatively easily be repaired by a carpenter cutting out and fixing the joist.
My dilemma is whether to believe the two damp proof companies who have bee out who have advised that I have 1 m of plaster removed, chemicals injected and then 3 layers of sand and cement/plaster with additives. Now if I go down this route I will remove the plaster myself (is it best to hire a bit of kit from a tool hire place to help with this?) and will have my own plasterer do the repairs, employing the damp proof company to just do the injections. Their prices for plastering were outrageous.
However I have spent hours reading about rising damp and have also had advice from a friend who assesses houses for the council (not a surveyor or damp expert) and he believes that the only damp is caused by condensation and the lack of sub floor ventilation. If I went with this assumption and got the minor repairs to the flooring and installed air bricks then I would save myself a huge amount of work, inconvenience and money. However I want to live in this house for the rest of my life, so want to get it right. I want to get it right, but not do work I don't need to do.
Based on my description what are your initial thoughts. Secondly where can I find the details of independent experts who do not work for damp proofing companies? I live 25 mins north of Bath, just into Wiltshire.
Many thanks for any assistance.