I'm still working on the layout of a proposed decking scheme. The concrete surface below is uneven so bricks and mortar will be used to provide level points on which C16-grade 145mm x 45mm joists will rest.
I have designed a configuration that should require the minimum number of cuts but I am uncertain whether this is structurally sound. I intend to attach the decking boards to noggins (red), rather than to the joists (green). Since they're both going to cut from the same timber, the only difference is that the joists (green) are continuous while the noggins (red) are shorter and are attached to the joists). As you can see from the designs, there is nary a noggin that doesn't rest on a brick. I could lay the boards diagonally across the frame but that would require many more cuts (and be difficult to model in my computer program).
The configuration, seen from below:
The configuration, seen from above, sans decking boards:
The configuration, seen from above, with decking boards:
I have designed a configuration that should require the minimum number of cuts but I am uncertain whether this is structurally sound. I intend to attach the decking boards to noggins (red), rather than to the joists (green). Since they're both going to cut from the same timber, the only difference is that the joists (green) are continuous while the noggins (red) are shorter and are attached to the joists). As you can see from the designs, there is nary a noggin that doesn't rest on a brick. I could lay the boards diagonally across the frame but that would require many more cuts (and be difficult to model in my computer program).
The configuration, seen from below:
The configuration, seen from above, sans decking boards:
The configuration, seen from above, with decking boards: