So I'm on the hunt for another car at the moment and my budget leads me to a small place selling crash repaired (Cat-D) cars - late models with low mileage for good prices.
One car took my fancy - the repair has been done to a good standard (I did take an expert with me), car has all the toys and they all work.
We take a quick squint at the paperwork whilst the salesman is called away and I notice that the last two MOTs are from different garages, conducted by different testers but amazingly, they both have the same signature!
Needless to say I didn't buy the car, and dropped an email to his local trading standards office when I got home.
What puzzles me is that A) He didn't just get the car MOTd - it was a late model in (as far as we could tell) good condition, and B) When faking the MOT why not just scrawl a different signature on the form instead of copying the same one from a different tester?
One car took my fancy - the repair has been done to a good standard (I did take an expert with me), car has all the toys and they all work.
We take a quick squint at the paperwork whilst the salesman is called away and I notice that the last two MOTs are from different garages, conducted by different testers but amazingly, they both have the same signature!
Needless to say I didn't buy the car, and dropped an email to his local trading standards office when I got home.
What puzzles me is that A) He didn't just get the car MOTd - it was a late model in (as far as we could tell) good condition, and B) When faking the MOT why not just scrawl a different signature on the form instead of copying the same one from a different tester?