crafty1289 said:
ban-all-sheds said:
crafty1289 said:
I've never used it, but...
I have. its too "integrated", sort of like AOL which has everything in one programme, mac os has a bar with icons in (IIRC) and thats it
Ironic that you've integrated your reply into my post in such a way that it's difficult to respond to each point.
But as for icon bars, when I look at my desktop I see icons on the task bar, in the system tray and on the Quick Start bar, so clearly Microsoft think there is something in that idea. I also have icons on my desktop, in just the same way that I have seen icons on MacOS desktops. GNOME desktops, KDE desktops, OSF/Motif desktops, TWM desktops....
Macs looks good, but sure aint practical or nice to use.
AFAICT you are in a minority of MacOS users there
I dont use mac os, i just dont like computers that are designed to look good, instead of functioning well (although they may well work well).
Err - just how long have you been a Windows user? Function over form? YMBFJ.
I'll bet quite a few people who buy a Mac dont realise it wont run windows until they get it home
<shrug>
The internet and networks are designed on a windows platform,
That will be why Windows 1.0 was released in 1985, by which time the concept of the Internet was 23 years old, ARPANET was 16 years old, email was 13 years old, TCP/IP was about 10 years old and ethernet was 12 years old.
And BTW - the first web browser was written for the NeXTSTEP platform, not Windows.
Mac boots up a desktop, and deserts you with a bunch of icons you have no idea about it isn't logical, and you have to read the instructions to figure it out!
,
Unlike this collection, of course, which would be immediately obvious to anyone who'd never seen them before:
You only have no idea about MacOS icons because they are different to what you know and you refuse to make any effort to learn something new.
Like I said, you really
really really really really need a much greater exposure to a much wider range of operating systems because you really
really really really really need a much broader outlook.
some things you obviously must read the instructions for. IMO, a computer isn't one of them. wouldn't you feel stupid reading the instructions for your new PC?
1) Please understand the difference between
(i) "a computer", which might be anything from a PC to a Unix server to a mainframe to a multi-node parallel processing super-computer
(ii) Any of the operating systems that the above might run
(iii) A PC.
I probably wouldn't need to read much to be able to switch on a new PC.
I would not feel stupid reading about if it was not a PC.
I would not feel stupid reading about the operating system if it was one with which I was unfamiliar.
I
would feel stupid if I adopted the attitude that I was not prepared to deal with anything new just because it was different to what I had previously encountered.