Sadly I cannot use this angle as their camera will prove otherwise. There was traffic ahead, but a good distance away.Did, the OP perhaps think he saw a pedestrian of cyclist, so deliberately tried to prevent an overtake on safety grounds?
Sadly I cannot use this angle as their camera will prove otherwise. There was traffic ahead, but a good distance away.Did, the OP perhaps think he saw a pedestrian of cyclist, so deliberately tried to prevent an overtake on safety grounds?
No, written up and ready to send.I have to say (speaking as judge might) I have real trouble with part of your statement 'as I was fearful of their intent - I moved out as they moved out'. Have you already submitted your response then?
How do your replies to my replies help?How does any of that help the OP?
I think he's smart enough to know that. You are just the same as dashcam guyMy replies tell the OP your replies don't help.
Just be contrite.
No "but they did" angles: that will just dilute your apology.
Apologise, grovel, say you panicked - a little - as you're such a quiet and meek driver, and a caring family man.
If you think the Tesla driver was goading you (to which you admit you reacted), bear in mind that the magistrate is likely to do the same. Goad you, looking for a bite.
If you think you'll bite at the magistrate, my advice would be to plead guilty by letter (if that's an option), rather than risk getting into an argument with them: which you WILL lose.
Apologise, apologise, apologise.
No ifs, no lies: just "sorry for wasting the court's time".
Have you seen the video ? or do they offer you a chance to see it.
and are the not offering you points and a fine, or even a course?
I would have thought they just want to know who was driving, and then they may make an offer like, 3 points & £100 or to go on a course to learn about lane discipline.