Hi,
I'm having an extractor fan fitted for an internal bathroom (with shower). The duct length to reach the outside wall is 9m (ducting is under floor) and is 100mm wide.
I've found a fan - the Airflow Icon 30 - which has a flow rate of 33l/second and which teh manufacturer says can work over up to 9m of ducting. So was going to install that. But then, looking at reviews, I found the Vent Axia Quadra. Which is a centrifugal fan that can be set to a flow rate of 60 l/s. So I'm thinking - even better, that will definitely keep the bathroom clear. However, I'm reading that it is only recommnded for a ducting length up to 6m.
Has anybody any idea why it would be that a fan with nearly twice as powerful a flow rate would apparently be less effective over longer ducting than the one half as powerful? Is it just manufacturers' having different, somewhat subjective standards in terms of what they are prepared to say their fans can do? Or is there some objective reason why the stronger fan would be less effective in practice?
Basically I'm wondering should I trust the manufacturer recommendations, and go with the Airflow? Or trust common sense and go with the more powerful, centrifugal fan?
Thanks for any help.
I'm having an extractor fan fitted for an internal bathroom (with shower). The duct length to reach the outside wall is 9m (ducting is under floor) and is 100mm wide.
I've found a fan - the Airflow Icon 30 - which has a flow rate of 33l/second and which teh manufacturer says can work over up to 9m of ducting. So was going to install that. But then, looking at reviews, I found the Vent Axia Quadra. Which is a centrifugal fan that can be set to a flow rate of 60 l/s. So I'm thinking - even better, that will definitely keep the bathroom clear. However, I'm reading that it is only recommnded for a ducting length up to 6m.
Has anybody any idea why it would be that a fan with nearly twice as powerful a flow rate would apparently be less effective over longer ducting than the one half as powerful? Is it just manufacturers' having different, somewhat subjective standards in terms of what they are prepared to say their fans can do? Or is there some objective reason why the stronger fan would be less effective in practice?
Basically I'm wondering should I trust the manufacturer recommendations, and go with the Airflow? Or trust common sense and go with the more powerful, centrifugal fan?
Thanks for any help.