False Crime Report

The point is the PM is showing a near zero tolerance for people who f**k around with him.
But she told him about it before he appointed her to the shadow cabinet though, didn’t she - where was his zero tolerance then?
 
Sponsored Links
Maybe he was upset at her bashing her lawyer. He would know that a lawyer would never advise a guilty plea.

I’m now not sure if I believe she was even mugged.

I suspect that is why the police referred for prosecution, not making a “genuine mistake”.

Shame.. she’s a very brave lady…. With that hair.
 
Shame.. she’s a very brave lady…. With that hair.
..and those clothes. She should have been prosecuted by the fashion police.

1732867483751.jpeg
 
Sponsored Links
The deputy political editor at the Mirror, interprets it this way: “Starmer’s reply essentially reads ‘sorry about all this, it’s exceptionally dumb, you’ll be back.’” Storm in a teacup, really, but mbk will doubtless fill the bilges with all kindsa b.s - man the pumps, it's gonna be a messy day.
 
Her statement reads:
As you know, in 2013 I was mugged in London. As a 24-year-old woman, the experience was terrifying. In the immediate aftermath, I reported the incident to the police. I gave the police a list of my possessions that I believed had been stolen, including my work phone. Some time later, I discovered that the handset in question was still in my house. I should have immediately informed my employer and not doing so straight away was a mistake.
 
Her statement reads:
As you know, in 2013 I was mugged in London. As a 24-year-old woman, the experience was terrifying. In the immediate aftermath, I reported the incident to the police. I gave the police a list of my possessions that I believed had been stolen, including my work phone. Some time later, I discovered that the handset in question was still in my house. I should have immediately informed my employer and not doing so straight away was a mistake.
People make mistakes, especially people who have been mugged. You think plod would pursue a s5 offence on the above?

For the offence to stick, she must have knowingly made a false statement to the police - i.e. told them lies.

As we know a guilty plea stops the facts coming out and we can make up a story that suits. Lawyers advise, they do not tell people who are innocent to plead guilty. That is career ending advice.
 
Last edited:
People make mistakes, especially people who have been mugged. You think plod would pursue a s5 offence on the above?

For the offence to stick, she must have knowingly made a false statement to the police - i.e. told them lies.

As we know a guilty plea stops the facts coming out and we can make up a story that suits. Lawyers advise, they do not tell people who are innocent to plead guilty. That is career ending advice.
people make mistakes all the time - since it cannot be proved she lied to plod, it remains unproven, and all you got left is speculation and conjecture - the perfect breeding ground for a 100 page merry-go-round. Enjoy.
 
people make mistakes all the time - since it cannot be proved she lied to plod, it remains unproven, and all you got left is speculation and conjecture - the perfect breeding ground for a 100 page merry-go-round. Enjoy.
I agree people make mistakes. "I thought they took my phone, turns out they didn't. I forgot to update you." That wouldn't result in being charged for the above s5 offence. She was convicted of making a false report. They had evidence of her deliberately lying, she pleaded guilty to making a false report - Lying to the police.

since it cannot be proved she lied to plod, it remains unproven
other than the fact she was charged, pleaded guilty and convicted, you mean :LOL:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top