My mother recently (4th march) bought a new laptop from Comet. I went round yesterday and the laptop has developed a crack through the LCD layer, with black "inky" stains in it. I have seen this before in phones and calculators etc. My mother insists they havent dropped, hit, bent it etc. There is no damage to the outer case of the laptop anywhere, nor any dents in the screen.
I rung the Asus helpline (at 8 pence per minute), who said it is probably customer damage. I insisted that it isnt, and he suggested emailing in some photos and an explanation so an engineer could look at it. The other option from them was a £35 pickup and inspection charge, which would be refunded if they found it was a manufacturing fault. Clearly without me pressing my case, they are going to insist it is customer damage (I know myself, this is what it looks like, but it isnt)
This is the email I sent today (with 3 photos attached - I tried to send 7 but their server rejected it)
Does anyone know if they will be able to tell if it IS customer damage by removing the screen casing? As far as I know it is down to them to prove this, so I want to know if there is any chance of this by them taking it to bits.
How can I attack this on their reply? I think their reply will explore the lines of "the screen could have been bent, without leaving superficial damage". Is it still down to them to prove this?
I really want to get this resolved for my mum - she waited ages to buy this laptop, and now its gone faulty.
One thing I didnt mention in the email is that this laptop has a poor design with regard to the screen hinges - when you fold it down, it gets so far then there is no resistance and it "drops". This is because there is no "clip" to hold it shut so there can be no resistance at the bottom of travel, or else the screen would never close. I dont know, but perhaps this might have contributed to this. Should i mention this next?
I rung the Asus helpline (at 8 pence per minute), who said it is probably customer damage. I insisted that it isnt, and he suggested emailing in some photos and an explanation so an engineer could look at it. The other option from them was a £35 pickup and inspection charge, which would be refunded if they found it was a manufacturing fault. Clearly without me pressing my case, they are going to insist it is customer damage (I know myself, this is what it looks like, but it isnt)
This is the email I sent today (with 3 photos attached - I tried to send 7 but their server rejected it)
Hi, further to my phone call with one of your representatives at 16:00 yesterday, I have attached 7 photos of the laptop in question (serial number ******************). The laptop actually belongs to my mother, who is not very technically minded, therefore I am dealing with this on her behalf.
As I hope you can see, the photos show no signs of any external damage to the laptop. I did try to send more photos but your mail server bounced it back to me saying the email was too large.
Photo 522 shows more detail of the cracked area. Clearly the whole left of the screen is unusable. There are visible cracks in the liquid crystal layer, from the black blob at the top, diagonally to the left, then another at the bottom left, with a third crack coming off this to the blob at the left side. There is no crack on the surface of the screen - the plastic surface is still intact. Only the liquid crystal layer is cracked, with the backlight just visible through the crack.
Photo 527 shows a reflective shot of the screen and surround, showing that there are no dents in the laptop around the screen, or on the screen itself.
Photo 529 shows the outer case of the laptop at the left of the screen. Hopefully this image conveys the fact that there is no damage, or indentations to the case of the laptop.
I find it hard to imagine a hard knock to the lid or screen of a brand new laptop would render the screen useless, yet leave no visible physical damage. Your representitive on the phone explored the possiblity of closing the laptop lid onto a wire or a pen, however I can assure you that this has not happened. A pen (or other object) would have left an indentation in the fragile surface of the screen - there is none. And to close (And BEND) the lid onto a wire would have required more force than any sensible person would have thought nessecary to close a laptop screen.
I hope that an engineer that reads this and studies the photos will conclude that, as I am explaining, the laptop was somehow manufactured with a fault that caused the screen to go faulty after only 18 days of use.
I do not see how, by sending the laptop in, someone will be able to conclude otherwise, since as the photos show, the laptop is cosmetically perfect, as new, showing no signs of forceful damage. Therefore, I would ask that Asus repair this laptop under its warranty, as in this case my mother has clearly been sold a faulty product.
Please reply by email to myself or telephone me on ************** to discuss the next steps in having this laptop repaired. My preference is email, so I can keep a written record of this matter.
Thankyou
Does anyone know if they will be able to tell if it IS customer damage by removing the screen casing? As far as I know it is down to them to prove this, so I want to know if there is any chance of this by them taking it to bits.
How can I attack this on their reply? I think their reply will explore the lines of "the screen could have been bent, without leaving superficial damage". Is it still down to them to prove this?
I really want to get this resolved for my mum - she waited ages to buy this laptop, and now its gone faulty.
One thing I didnt mention in the email is that this laptop has a poor design with regard to the screen hinges - when you fold it down, it gets so far then there is no resistance and it "drops". This is because there is no "clip" to hold it shut so there can be no resistance at the bottom of travel, or else the screen would never close. I dont know, but perhaps this might have contributed to this. Should i mention this next?