I have had quotes from 4 CORGIs for a boiler replacement in a small property.
3 of them have quoted £300-£350 for power flush if we keep the existing 4 radiators and suggested we'd be better spending an extra £150 or so on 4 new radiators and pipes.
However one has come up with a really interesting solution. Rather than power flushing he reckons we'd get away with a flush to get the worst gunk out and then he'd put a filter on the return to the boiler which would be periodically rinsed (by me).
Is such a solution legal under the Corgi rules?
Is such a solution unwise and if so why?
Other questions:
All CORGIS have quoted for boilers about 3 times more powerful than is really required on the basis that we want a decent hot shower, however all reckon that a smaller boiler won't actually reduce the quote much so we should just go for a bigger boiler. (I assume the reality is they have boilers that they like working with.)
Some of our rads have "micro-pipes" (8mm IIRC). Should that be replaced as a matter of course?
Thanks in advance.
3 of them have quoted £300-£350 for power flush if we keep the existing 4 radiators and suggested we'd be better spending an extra £150 or so on 4 new radiators and pipes.
However one has come up with a really interesting solution. Rather than power flushing he reckons we'd get away with a flush to get the worst gunk out and then he'd put a filter on the return to the boiler which would be periodically rinsed (by me).
Is such a solution legal under the Corgi rules?
Is such a solution unwise and if so why?
Other questions:
All CORGIS have quoted for boilers about 3 times more powerful than is really required on the basis that we want a decent hot shower, however all reckon that a smaller boiler won't actually reduce the quote much so we should just go for a bigger boiler. (I assume the reality is they have boilers that they like working with.)
Some of our rads have "micro-pipes" (8mm IIRC). Should that be replaced as a matter of course?
Thanks in advance.