Last week I ripped a load of dodgy wiring out of the conservatory and I want to redo it.
I had a 2.5mm cable coming through the bathroom wall from the socket ring, connected to a junction box which then fed a socket and a 5 amp fused spur connected to another junction box which connected the light switch and light fitting.
I want to simplify all this junk and I thought of doing the following. Run the 2.5 to a 5 amp fused spur supply then another cable in the supply connection back out to the socket. So the fused spur will have two cables in the supply connection. Then the load of the spur would connect to one wire of each of the light switch cable and the light fitting, with the other wire of each connected within the spur back box.
This would remove the need for two junction boxes and be a lot cleaner.. I'm pretty sure it'd work.. But is this even remotely acceptable? I would get this checked out by a spark afterwards.
I had a 2.5mm cable coming through the bathroom wall from the socket ring, connected to a junction box which then fed a socket and a 5 amp fused spur connected to another junction box which connected the light switch and light fitting.
I want to simplify all this junk and I thought of doing the following. Run the 2.5 to a 5 amp fused spur supply then another cable in the supply connection back out to the socket. So the fused spur will have two cables in the supply connection. Then the load of the spur would connect to one wire of each of the light switch cable and the light fitting, with the other wire of each connected within the spur back box.
This would remove the need for two junction boxes and be a lot cleaner.. I'm pretty sure it'd work.. But is this even remotely acceptable? I would get this checked out by a spark afterwards.