My Aqualisa thermostatic shower valve has failed and cant be resurrected. The tradesman who came to cut it off(it was leaking) says I can replace it and it would cost around £350 to £400.
I am wondering whether it is really worth having a thermostatic shower valve rather than a simple mixer. The previous one had a separate cold supply which protected from violent changes in water temperature. The shower valve unit is only about 12inches from the hot water cylinder . The thing is that whatever is connected, there isnt a lot of plumbing(the old feeds capped off for now). So I am not to keen on such big cost and would like advice on mixer versus thermostatic.
Hope someone can help.
Jim
I am wondering whether it is really worth having a thermostatic shower valve rather than a simple mixer. The previous one had a separate cold supply which protected from violent changes in water temperature. The shower valve unit is only about 12inches from the hot water cylinder . The thing is that whatever is connected, there isnt a lot of plumbing(the old feeds capped off for now). So I am not to keen on such big cost and would like advice on mixer versus thermostatic.
Hope someone can help.
Jim