Is it normal for a high/low security light with PIR to turn off as part of the process? - What I'm seeing is as follows:
- At Dusk, security light comes on at "low level" lighting
- When movement is sensed by the PIR, the light switches to "high" for the period of time set on the timer (1min)
- After the period of time has passed without movement the light swicthes from "high" to "low" for about 1second and then turns off where it remains off for 3-5seconds.
- After this time the light turns back on at "low" level until movement is seen again.
If this was a normal PIR light this would be expected in that the light would be off, come on with movement and then turn off when no movement is seen and then only re-light when movement happens again.
I would have however thought that with a "high/low security light" the light would switch from "low" to "high" to "low" again and only turn off when the sun rises in the morning.
The light has a 60W GLS ES bulb as stated in the instructions.
Does anyone else have experience with these types of security lights and can confirm this is expected?
- At Dusk, security light comes on at "low level" lighting
- When movement is sensed by the PIR, the light switches to "high" for the period of time set on the timer (1min)
- After the period of time has passed without movement the light swicthes from "high" to "low" for about 1second and then turns off where it remains off for 3-5seconds.
- After this time the light turns back on at "low" level until movement is seen again.
If this was a normal PIR light this would be expected in that the light would be off, come on with movement and then turn off when no movement is seen and then only re-light when movement happens again.
I would have however thought that with a "high/low security light" the light would switch from "low" to "high" to "low" again and only turn off when the sun rises in the morning.
The light has a 60W GLS ES bulb as stated in the instructions.
Does anyone else have experience with these types of security lights and can confirm this is expected?