There are currently several territorial disputes and "historical claims" in the world today. Some of them are over resources (Spratley Islands), but some seem to have little value. We have Argentina who want the Falklands, Spain who want Gibraltar, apparently a few French want the Channel Islands... and those are just a few "historical claims" involving Britain. I am not sure if we have any state-backed campaign to get back Normandy, but I can't guarantee that
I can't help but think it's all a bit daft. Not in that I think we should give the lands away to whoever wants them, but because the claims seem so tenuous and ancient.
And in all cases there are plenty of other disputes that could be made: would Spain be happy to give away Ceuta to Morocco? Or hand over control of the Canaries to Western Sahara, as an example. Or perhaps give Corsica to Italy? In the case of the EU states it's all a bit academic I guess.
Oh, and I'm yet to hear of any state-backed campaigns to move the continental European borders back to pre-1914 locations.
Which all leads me to think: do the states making claims against the territories of others over "historical claim" really mean it? Or is it just something they do to pass the time, or a dispute they can keep in their back pocket next time they want an argument?
Or is it because as an island, we feel borders are easily defined (by water) and those who live in countries with land-borders are a little more edgy about them?
I can't help but think it's all a bit daft. Not in that I think we should give the lands away to whoever wants them, but because the claims seem so tenuous and ancient.
And in all cases there are plenty of other disputes that could be made: would Spain be happy to give away Ceuta to Morocco? Or hand over control of the Canaries to Western Sahara, as an example. Or perhaps give Corsica to Italy? In the case of the EU states it's all a bit academic I guess.
Oh, and I'm yet to hear of any state-backed campaigns to move the continental European borders back to pre-1914 locations.
Which all leads me to think: do the states making claims against the territories of others over "historical claim" really mean it? Or is it just something they do to pass the time, or a dispute they can keep in their back pocket next time they want an argument?
Or is it because as an island, we feel borders are easily defined (by water) and those who live in countries with land-borders are a little more edgy about them?