- Joined
- 8 Feb 2022
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
First post, so thanks in advance for help and opinions.
I have recently bought a four bed, just partner and I but kids in future etc.
Currently has conventional / system boiler with 20+ Yr old boiler, small poorly insulated cylinder and unsealed header tank.
I was about to convert to combi (and accept the dual hot water consumption limitations). But I have recently thought about making better use of the approx 2.5kw solar array on the roof. For reasons I can explain if people want, it makes strong financial sense for me to usefully consume as much of the solar energy as I can as opposed to sell to grid.
So now I am thinking to have a new conventional boiler fitted with a new pressurised cylinder and use a solar diverter to send all spare power to the cylinder via an immersion.
Has anyone done this or got experience or ideas? What I want to happen is to heat water in this order of preference
1. Surplus electricity (free)
2. Gas (8.5p / kwh)
3. (never) grid electricity (30p/kwh)
Having the solar diverter takes care of the third point above. But would am I right in thinking I can set different trigger temps for immersion heater and boiler heater (to fire the boiler)?
Say;
1.Immersion heater to come on (when surplus power only, dealt with by diverter) at any temp and switch off at the max safe temp of the tank (say 65 deg c?).
2. Boiler to fire and send heat to cylinder when temp drops to 50deg and cut off when tank at 55 deg.
Basically I'm Scottish and tight and want the boiler to fire when it needs to, but not unnecessarily!
Any thoughts on feasibility to diffent temps for each thermostat?
Have I over looked somthing?
I know about top and bottom immersion heaters and the logic of that, but I think in this instance I'd want them both low down...?
Cheers
I have recently bought a four bed, just partner and I but kids in future etc.
Currently has conventional / system boiler with 20+ Yr old boiler, small poorly insulated cylinder and unsealed header tank.
I was about to convert to combi (and accept the dual hot water consumption limitations). But I have recently thought about making better use of the approx 2.5kw solar array on the roof. For reasons I can explain if people want, it makes strong financial sense for me to usefully consume as much of the solar energy as I can as opposed to sell to grid.
So now I am thinking to have a new conventional boiler fitted with a new pressurised cylinder and use a solar diverter to send all spare power to the cylinder via an immersion.
Has anyone done this or got experience or ideas? What I want to happen is to heat water in this order of preference
1. Surplus electricity (free)
2. Gas (8.5p / kwh)
3. (never) grid electricity (30p/kwh)
Having the solar diverter takes care of the third point above. But would am I right in thinking I can set different trigger temps for immersion heater and boiler heater (to fire the boiler)?
Say;
1.Immersion heater to come on (when surplus power only, dealt with by diverter) at any temp and switch off at the max safe temp of the tank (say 65 deg c?).
2. Boiler to fire and send heat to cylinder when temp drops to 50deg and cut off when tank at 55 deg.
Basically I'm Scottish and tight and want the boiler to fire when it needs to, but not unnecessarily!
Any thoughts on feasibility to diffent temps for each thermostat?
Have I over looked somthing?
I know about top and bottom immersion heaters and the logic of that, but I think in this instance I'd want them both low down...?
Cheers