Hello,
my heating system has two motorised 2-way valves, one for CH one for HW.
Recently my HW valve stuck open, I freed it and all was fine. Yesterday I returned home to find my boiler had been firing all day - valve stuck open again - and motor in the valve is shot now too.
I could buy a new motor for £13.50, or alternatively I could leave the HW valve permanently open so that I always get hot water with CH.
I'd leave the CH valve in place to disable CH in summer.
what are the drawbacks? I'd never want CH with no HW. only one I can think of is no cylinder thermostat function when CH is on.
I think I'd prefer this - it would mean I always have HW in winter due to CH being on, without having to fire the boiler just for the HW.
Is there a strong argument for having a separate HW zone? Thanks in advance
my heating system has two motorised 2-way valves, one for CH one for HW.
Recently my HW valve stuck open, I freed it and all was fine. Yesterday I returned home to find my boiler had been firing all day - valve stuck open again - and motor in the valve is shot now too.
I could buy a new motor for £13.50, or alternatively I could leave the HW valve permanently open so that I always get hot water with CH.
I'd leave the CH valve in place to disable CH in summer.
what are the drawbacks? I'd never want CH with no HW. only one I can think of is no cylinder thermostat function when CH is on.
I think I'd prefer this - it would mean I always have HW in winter due to CH being on, without having to fire the boiler just for the HW.
Is there a strong argument for having a separate HW zone? Thanks in advance