Hi,
In Jan'11 we had the entire roof an old c1830's Victorian farmhouse completely recovered which involved fitting felt, new lathes, guttering, flashing and re-fitting slates (around 25% new). The house is made up of an older 'cottage' part with a newer main part to the front, so the 'cottage' roof abuts to a gable end of the main house, hence there are four gable ends and each has coping stones (see photos below).
The coping stones were removed and re-bedded during the re-roof. However, damp penetration over the stairwell which is below the cottage/main house gable end, and which was evident before the restoration started, has clearly continued and has now penetrated through new plaster and paint (even though the plasterer and decorator said it was dry, grrrr).
I recently also noticed a bad leak in the main roof space around the chimney flashing which made me check every nook and cranny of the roof spaces, particularly the gable ends and the rafters adjacent to the copers.
In addition to the continued damp penetration above the stairwell, I have found water droplets on the inside of the felt next to the outermost rafters under the coping stones, damp and mould on some of these rafters, and also signs of damp on the internal stone directly under one of the gable end apexes. This has made be seriously question whether or not the coping stones have been re-bedded properly.
See photos below which were taken during the roofing work, and which show the solid gable end walls, i.e. no cavity, and the lack of lead work before the copers were relaid. I think the roofer has trimmed the felt, laid the slates up to the gable end walls and then laid the copers on the wall before applying a large fillet of mortar. Is this correct/acceptable practice or have I got a case to go to the original builder with who contracted the roofer? I suspect the copers should have been re-bedded on lead flashing with suitable lead soakers, and doing this now will cost around £10-15k which the builder will no doubt be reluctant to do, meaning I may regrettably be forced to go down the legal route if I have a strong case.
Any professional technical advice would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
In Jan'11 we had the entire roof an old c1830's Victorian farmhouse completely recovered which involved fitting felt, new lathes, guttering, flashing and re-fitting slates (around 25% new). The house is made up of an older 'cottage' part with a newer main part to the front, so the 'cottage' roof abuts to a gable end of the main house, hence there are four gable ends and each has coping stones (see photos below).
The coping stones were removed and re-bedded during the re-roof. However, damp penetration over the stairwell which is below the cottage/main house gable end, and which was evident before the restoration started, has clearly continued and has now penetrated through new plaster and paint (even though the plasterer and decorator said it was dry, grrrr).
I recently also noticed a bad leak in the main roof space around the chimney flashing which made me check every nook and cranny of the roof spaces, particularly the gable ends and the rafters adjacent to the copers.
In addition to the continued damp penetration above the stairwell, I have found water droplets on the inside of the felt next to the outermost rafters under the coping stones, damp and mould on some of these rafters, and also signs of damp on the internal stone directly under one of the gable end apexes. This has made be seriously question whether or not the coping stones have been re-bedded properly.
See photos below which were taken during the roofing work, and which show the solid gable end walls, i.e. no cavity, and the lack of lead work before the copers were relaid. I think the roofer has trimmed the felt, laid the slates up to the gable end walls and then laid the copers on the wall before applying a large fillet of mortar. Is this correct/acceptable practice or have I got a case to go to the original builder with who contracted the roofer? I suspect the copers should have been re-bedded on lead flashing with suitable lead soakers, and doing this now will cost around £10-15k which the builder will no doubt be reluctant to do, meaning I may regrettably be forced to go down the legal route if I have a strong case.
Any professional technical advice would be much appreciated.
Thanks.