I am in dispute with Caradon over the reliability of an Ideal Classic Boiler installed in 1999 and which required major repairs in 2003 requiring the installation of a new PCB, Expansion Vessel, and Air Pressure Gauge. I am taking Caradon to the Small Claims Court but need an expert witness's opinion on the design (whether dated / outdated)and (un)reliability etc of the boiler. Can anyone please help or offer any suggestions?
would the Ideal Classic FF250 have been considered somewhat outdated by 1999, when my boiler was installed, or would the time period, from first production in 1991 to installation in 1999, come within the expected design life of such a boiler? Secondly, although my Ideal Boiler was installed and serviced by CORGI registered installers, Caradon subsequently pointed out that that parts can fail prematurely due to system related problems, i.e. incorrect flow rates through the boiler, poor system balancing or lack of external controls. Could you kindly advise as to whether, in your opinion, this is a valid argument, especially in view of the fact that the boiler was installed and serviced by CORGI registered installers? Also it would be helpful to have your comments as to whether it would have been likely that any, or a combination, of the problems advanced by Caradon would have led to the extensive need for the replacement of major components, i.e. the PCB, Expansion Vessel, and Air Pressure Switch, or is it more likely that the problems with the boiler were, on the balance of probability, due to failure of component parts? With grateful thanks for any further comments you may be able to offer. Charles
MOD
please see item 4
would the Ideal Classic FF250 have been considered somewhat outdated by 1999, when my boiler was installed, or would the time period, from first production in 1991 to installation in 1999, come within the expected design life of such a boiler? Secondly, although my Ideal Boiler was installed and serviced by CORGI registered installers, Caradon subsequently pointed out that that parts can fail prematurely due to system related problems, i.e. incorrect flow rates through the boiler, poor system balancing or lack of external controls. Could you kindly advise as to whether, in your opinion, this is a valid argument, especially in view of the fact that the boiler was installed and serviced by CORGI registered installers? Also it would be helpful to have your comments as to whether it would have been likely that any, or a combination, of the problems advanced by Caradon would have led to the extensive need for the replacement of major components, i.e. the PCB, Expansion Vessel, and Air Pressure Switch, or is it more likely that the problems with the boiler were, on the balance of probability, due to failure of component parts? With grateful thanks for any further comments you may be able to offer. Charles
MOD
please see item 4