I'm getting quotes for a roof to be re-tiled. One company has offered a 15 year guarantee however it's not insurance backed. They advise they can offer this, however there would be an additional cost.
The company has been operational since 2008, good reviews etc, however given this is quite a significant job price wise I think I'd feel more comfortable ensuring the guarantee I have is insurance backed. Although I obviously hope this doesn't happen, the company could cease trading a few years from now and a non insurance backed guarantee would be next to worthless?
Is my rationale correct to opt for a more robust guarantee in this instance i.e. big job?
The company has been operational since 2008, good reviews etc, however given this is quite a significant job price wise I think I'd feel more comfortable ensuring the guarantee I have is insurance backed. Although I obviously hope this doesn't happen, the company could cease trading a few years from now and a non insurance backed guarantee would be next to worthless?
Is my rationale correct to opt for a more robust guarantee in this instance i.e. big job?