If it's within the budget, then the LG OLEDs are worth it IMO. The 55" OLED55BX6 isn't perfect if you're an avid gamer or have a room with a lot of ambient light, but compared to most 55" TVs around the £1,000 mark it's probably one of the most impressive.
I'm less enamoured of the LG Nanocell sets; even the higher-end ones close to OLED prices. They're just not good value when you start to dig in to the specs.
For example, the 55NANO806PA sells for around £950 so it's definitely not what I'd call mid-range LED-LCD. It's well above that, IMO. However, it still has just a 50Hz 8bit panel and is edge-lit. Sure, it has wide viewing angles, Freesat HD and the magic remote with it's mouseball pointer (it's BT, not magic), but the fundamental features that make a difference when watching both ordinary TV and 4K content are very-much lacking.
Compare and contrast the £950 LG with the £1000 Sony 55" XH9505. Here you get a 100/120Hz true full-10bit panel with full array local dimming. You also get Dolby Vision which is missing from the LG. By all accounts the Sony goes much brighter too because they fit decent backlights. There's a useful review of the Sony at
rtings. They've also done a review of the
LG Nanocell set. Just compare the screen brightness readings:
for ordinary TV viewing, DVDs, Blu-rays, non-4K content etc:-
LG's SDR Real Scene Peak Brightness 207 cd/m² - this is about what I'd expect from a £450 Sharp / Hitachi / HiSense / Samsung / LG. No one should be paying nearly £1000 for a TV and getting this kind of brightness output.
Sony's SDR Real Scene Peak Brightness 565 cd/m²
The Sony is almost 3x brighter than the LG in real world usage
for UHD 4K HDR streaming/download, Sky/Virgin UHD, and UHD BD discs:-
LG's UHD HDR Real Scene Highlight 247 cd/m² - a 19% increase in brightness compare to SDR
Sony's UHD HDR Real Scene Highlight 980 cd/m² - a 73% increase in brightness compare to SDR
The Sony is almost 4x brighter for 4K UHD HDR