- Joined
- 29 Mar 2005
- Messages
- 178
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
Hi,
Having just removed the skirting board in our dining room ready for the plasterer to come next week I've just found that we've got a double socket spur feeding on to a further spur.
What is more, the cable route is bad. The supply from the ring comes down from the ceiling to the first socket (OK) and of course this is where it should then stop.
The spurred spur is about 8 feet to the right of the first spur, yet the ongoing cable leaves the first spur on the left. It goes across about 4 inches and then goes down to behind skirting level. Then, it turns right again, running behind the skirting beneath the the first spur socket at a height of 3 inches off the floor and then heads vertically again to come up underneath the spurred spur.
What surprises me more is that this work looks original (house built 1976). It uses the same old 2.5 T+E with 1mm CPC (!!) that I'd found on the rest of the original ring and has solid green earth sleeving. I know my house has been subjected to DIY disasters by former owners but this really doen't look as if it was added later.
Obviously I need to sort this out (and I'm glad I found it in time to put it right before the plasterers come) but was this sort of practice common in the 70s?
Having just removed the skirting board in our dining room ready for the plasterer to come next week I've just found that we've got a double socket spur feeding on to a further spur.
What is more, the cable route is bad. The supply from the ring comes down from the ceiling to the first socket (OK) and of course this is where it should then stop.
The spurred spur is about 8 feet to the right of the first spur, yet the ongoing cable leaves the first spur on the left. It goes across about 4 inches and then goes down to behind skirting level. Then, it turns right again, running behind the skirting beneath the the first spur socket at a height of 3 inches off the floor and then heads vertically again to come up underneath the spurred spur.
What surprises me more is that this work looks original (house built 1976). It uses the same old 2.5 T+E with 1mm CPC (!!) that I'd found on the rest of the original ring and has solid green earth sleeving. I know my house has been subjected to DIY disasters by former owners but this really doen't look as if it was added later.
Obviously I need to sort this out (and I'm glad I found it in time to put it right before the plasterers come) but was this sort of practice common in the 70s?