Woody, this is why I mentioned different BC having different definitions of "inhabitable" (from Planning Portal)
For example, the Building Regulations Approved documents provide 3 separate definitions in different parts:
- Part B: A room used, or intended to be used, for dwellinghouse purposes (including for the purposes of Part B, a kitchen but not a bathroom).
- Part F: A room used for dwelling purposes but which is not solely a kitchen, utility room, bathroom, cellar or sanitary accommodation.
- Part M: a room used, or intended to be used, for dwelling purposes including a kitchen but not a bathroom or utility room.
Owain, Interesting angle re house being uninhabitable if kitchen in conservatory. I would agree that a few ikea units plonked in a plastic conservatory would be unlikely to sell or add value but the blur between conservatory and extension in regs and possibility of having a kitchen "extension" without BC or Planning involvement is intriguing (norwithstanding electrics etc being signed off)