I have the same type of bulb in same type of shade however the base of the bulb is at bottom so light is reflected off the ceiling, started in the room as new build 1979 with 2 x 100W bulbs (3200 lumen approx) around 5 years latter we had moved to three bulb fittings so 6 bulbs in the room at 60W each (4800 lumen approx) at 40W (2700 lumen approx) we found 60W a bit bright but 40W a bit dim. As we moved to energy saving we got 11W (3960 lumen approx) which never seemed bright enough and the bulbs stuck out of the shade so looked rotten, so moved to 5 bulb lamp holders and Philips 8W globe bulbs (3700 lumen approx) and the room really looked dim a huge disappointment. Then they started to fail, we had done two rooms so replaced 6 bulbs in other room with slightly physical larger bulbs from Home Bargains and used those removed as spares but still these bulbs which were claimed at our usage should last 10 years, after just 2 years of 16 bulbs just 8 still working. At this point likely three or four years ago Lidi were doing some 1.8W LED's I bought them to fit in reading lamps but while looking for replacements for living room put them in living room. I could not believe how bright they looked, so next time Lidi did bulbs got 8 x 3W that was all they had so around 2500 lumen. However like your self after they had been in a while they seemed dimmer so swapped and used the 3W in mothers house with smaller room and moved to 5W at home so 3500 lumen. I have not had a single 230 volt LED bulb fail.
However if I look at the history above at one point we went to 4800 lumen and now we have 3500 lumen which is about the same as those original twin 100W bulbs. When we dropped to 2500 lumen I think it was colour of bulb which made us consider they were brighter, and we found we needed reading lamps to read with but to walk around they were ample. In mothers house both down stairs rooms had changed from single light fittings to twin, one room has two 10W bulbs so around 1600 lumen about same as old 100W bulb and other room is 2500 lumen with 10 bulbs and it does seem we get use to the extra light and I would say look dimmer, however if I look at photographs taken the camera is using the same settings so I know really they have not got dimmer it is just me who sees them as dimmer.
The big problem is although I can get a 13W Philips bulb with either E27 or BA22d fitting with a 1521 lumen output which is nearly as bright as the old 100W bulb, one it is Philips and already bit buying Philips and two costs £8 each which seems rather a lot of money for a bulb. At 3.6W a candle LED bulb is just 72p (
screwfix) so what I have done is use low wattage, but more of them. The whole idea of lighting seems to have moved to using more bulbs, and also more switching options, wall lights and ceiling lights on separate switches rather than dimming lights.
I do think LED lamps do dim with time, but if you buy same lumen as old tungsten as they settle down from original extra bright the lumen does seem to relate LED to tungsten, however it does not seem to relate CFL to tungsten.