i will shortly, lay approx. 6 mtrs of 'Aquaflow' driveway linear drainage channel.
Problem is, the usage of 110mm pipework throughout seems alittle over the top for the amount channel used. Using a P-trap and a short length to the Rainwater water chamber close-by.
Ideally, I thought 50 or 68mm drain pipe is more than large enough for the amount of water collected based on last Winters deluge.
So i thought of using a 110 to 68mm reducer on the underside of the channel, short 68mm pipe to three 68mm 90deg bends to form a P-Trap, then a short 68mm pipe of approx 400mm to the Rainwater chamber.
The reason on the thought as above, next door who had a channels system laid across his garage entrance, where he had paving blocks laid on his sloping drive towards his garage. The company who laid his channel system used a 40mm pipe into a downpipe P-trap and grate covered drain, by drilling a hole in its side..
Are there any reasons why I should not do this, this way or any easier way
thanks
Problem is, the usage of 110mm pipework throughout seems alittle over the top for the amount channel used. Using a P-trap and a short length to the Rainwater water chamber close-by.
Ideally, I thought 50 or 68mm drain pipe is more than large enough for the amount of water collected based on last Winters deluge.
So i thought of using a 110 to 68mm reducer on the underside of the channel, short 68mm pipe to three 68mm 90deg bends to form a P-Trap, then a short 68mm pipe of approx 400mm to the Rainwater chamber.
The reason on the thought as above, next door who had a channels system laid across his garage entrance, where he had paving blocks laid on his sloping drive towards his garage. The company who laid his channel system used a 40mm pipe into a downpipe P-trap and grate covered drain, by drilling a hole in its side..
Are there any reasons why I should not do this, this way or any easier way
thanks