I get email link re a subject then when I attempt to open it, it comes up "this topic does not exist" Anyone know what that is all about or is it just my computer throwing a fit.
BE HAPPY
BE HAPPY
williams89 said:I get email link re a subject then when I attempt to open it, it comes up "this topic does not exist" Anyone know what that is all about or is it just my computer throwing a fit.
BE HAPPY
Thank you.moderator said:williams89 said:I get email link re a subject then when I attempt to open it, it comes up "this topic does not exist" Anyone know what that is all about or is it just my computer throwing a fit.
BE HAPPY
I can answer that.
Some times new members reply to old posts, so if you have requested an email notification of a reply you will get an email.
But as its an old post replied to it breaks the forum rules, so the reply is removed.
But sometimes the post is "split" after the reply is made, so the email you receive is about a post that does not exist.
On the odd occasion regretfully the split is not successful and the whole topic is lost.
But if new members were to read and abide the rules this would not
happen.
I have also put this post back where it should be, but at first “glance” I agree it does look like a software question
regards Lynda
Blimey! Is that what it is!!moderator said:Some times new members reply to old posts, so if you have requested an email notification of a reply you will get an email.
But as its an old post replied to it breaks the forum rules, so the reply is removed.
But sometimes the post is "split" after the reply is made, so the email you receive is about a post that does not exist.
On the odd occasion regretfully the split is not successful and the whole topic is lost.
But if new members were to read and abide the rules this would not
happen.
oilman said:If people aren't allowed to reply to old posts, why don't you have an auto-timelock, so the information can still be there and we don't have another ridiculous situation of never knowing if something will be there for reference..
oilman said:In that case get rid of the rule then there's no problem at all.
I'm trying not to appear aggressive, but you know full well that not one of those posts I referenced were removed for the reasons that you state here.moderator said:================================
The links that you posted (i removed as they no longer exist) i should guess were removed as they were probably removed after you read them.