Lucy Letby......More revelations.

Sponsored Links
I dont know if she was guilty or not, but a public inquiry where she has no right to defend herself is hardly a fair way to establish criminality. 40%?
 
Public inquiry should be about learning lessons. The fact is, she has been found guilty.

No doubt if that changes. There will be another to learn the lessons of finger pointing without evidence
 
Yes, but the brief’s opening comment that the convictions did not tell the whole story suggests LL was also guilty of other deaths. The terms of reference focus solely on her culpability in relation to the convictions, so if the inquiry strays into the other deaths, it should also look at all relevant information, including statistical techniques used.
 
Sponsored Links
This has already been covered in the other thread. The new stuff has the same statistical aspect problems as the rest.
 
I dont know if she was guilty or not, but a public inquiry where she has no right to defend herself is hardly a fair way to establish criminality. 40%?
The public enquiry is not a trial.
 
The public enquiry is not a trial.
Indeed but recent inquiries have concluded that criminal breaches of the law occurred whether by named individuals or organisations. The experts have questioned whether the assertion at the inquiry that harm was 40 times more likely when LL was on shift is statistically well founded. Alternatively if it is then why was nothing done for a decade?

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top