Max Mosley: dirty ol' man or sex supergod?

Was the NOW right to publish this non-story?

  • Yes: those who are "famous" should have impeccable standards

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes: but only because we're nosey b'stards

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Yes: but only because we're jealous of an old bloke getting it on with five birds

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • No: providing those taking part are happy, what goes on behind doors is up to them and them alone

    Votes: 7 53.8%
  • No: I don't want to know about such depraved behaviour

    Votes: 1 7.7%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Joined
22 Feb 2008
Messages
4,864
Reaction score
15
Location
Norfolk
Country
United Kingdom
Quite why this was deemed "in the public interest" is beyond me, I have to say. Salacious "scandal" upping the rag-sale count, perchance?

Still, he won, good on him, I say :).
 
Sponsored Links
So the whole reason for the court case was that they may/may not have been dressed up as Nazi's? (Well if it's good enough for the Royals?)
 
Sponsored Links
As I said, then:
Salacious "scandal" upping the rag-sale count, perchance

Needless to say, all the media types are moaning about this ruling being a further erosion of press freedom.

Good. Scumbags (generally).
 
I don't see anything enviable about "getting it on with five birds"

after all, he did have to pay them.

seems a pity he never told his wife about his sexual interests.
 
Maybe its the envy of not having the money to be able to copy it? ;)
 
He was a public schoolboy what do you expect?
 
he claims not. Of course yoiu never know who's telling the truth.

She might have preferred not having him resort to prostitutes :confused:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top