BAS — With due respect (if any be due
) it's you who needs to pay more attention.
I have quoted from the Approved Document. This is the government's advice on the interpretation of part P, not mine.
No it's not - it's your highly selective and frankly quite bizarre reading of AD P.
Try p7:
Notification of work
When necessary to involve building
control bodies
0.6 Except in the circumstances outlined in
paragraph 0.7 below, notification of proposals to
carry out electrical installation work must be given
to a building control body (the local authority or
an approved inspector) before work begins.
When not necessary to involve building
control bodies
0.7 It is not necessary to give prior notification
of proposals to carry out electrical installation
work to building control bodies in the following
circumstances:
a. The proposed installation work is undertaken
by a person registered with an electrical self certification
scheme prescribed in regulations
(see schedule 2A of the Regulations). In these
cases the person is responsible for ensuring
compliance with BS 7671:2001 or an
equivalent standard and all relevant building
regulations requirements. A full list of schemes
with contact details is given in Appendix E.
OR
b. The proposed electrical installation work is
non-notifiable work of the type described in
Table 1 and does not include the provision of
a new circuit (see schedule 2B of the
Regulations).
There is absolutely no doubt that AD P is telling you to refer to Schedules 2A and 2B of the Building Regulations to determine if work is notifiable in advance.
Shall we now look at Table 1 on p8? As we go through it, let's ask ourselves if the work proposed by diyer83 matches the description of work which is not notifiable....
Replacing any fixed electrical equipment (for example, socket-outlets, control switches and ceiling roses) which does not include the
provision of any new fixed cabling.
[Nope.]
Replacing the cable for a single circuit only, where damaged, for example, by fire, rodent or impact (a)
[Nope.]
Re-fixing or replacing the enclosures of existing installation components (b)
[Nope.]
Providing mechanical protection to existing fixed installations (c)
[Nope.]
Installing or upgrading main or supplementary equipotential bonding (d)
[Nope.]
Work that is not in a kitchen or special location and does not involve a special installation (e) and consists of:
Adding lighting points (light fittings and switches) to an existing circuit (f)
[Nope.]
Adding socket-outlets and fused spurs to an existing ring or radial circuit (f)
[Nope.]
Work not in a special location, on:
Telephone or extra-low voltage wiring and equipment for the purposes of communications, information technology, signalling, control
and similar purposes
[Nope.]
Prefabricated equipment sets and associated flexible leads with integral plug and socket connections
[Nope.]
Oh dear - we've reached the end of Table 1, and not found any match which would make the installation of the CU and the new circuits non-notifiable.
That means they are notifiable, and AD P is absolutely clear on that.
Note (f) says "Work within them is notifiable only if it involves new outdoor wiring.
And, obviously (to everyone except you, it seems) if it's already notifiable for other reasons.
Work in this case includes the provision of a cu and two circuits.
Yup. Can you find where in either Table 1 or
Schedule 2B the provision of a CU and two circuits is defined as non-notifiable?
That's the way it works - absolutely everything is notifiable unless it is explicitly on the list of non-notifiable work.
Now I know that this appears to conflict with note (c) but that note applies to a replacement cu, not to the new one proposed.
It's not in conflict with Note (c) at all, because it is nothing to do with the situation which Note (c) is clarifying, which is Note (b), i.e.
Replacement, repair and maintenance jobs
are generally not notifiable, even if carried out
in a kitchen or special location or associated
with a special installation.
And in any event - saying that "
Consumer unit replacements are, however, notifiable" does not imply that new consumer units are not. Those clearly are notifiable
because they are not on the list of non-notifiable work.
There is, of course, a vast difference between a small cu in a shed and a cu in a dwelling, so the apparant anomaly could be intentional.
There is no anomaly, intentional or otherwise.
As for note (a), that is indeed in direct conflict with note (f).
No it isn't.
The law, as referenced on p7.
The list of non-notifiable work as referenced on p7.
The list of non-notifiable work given in Table 1 on p8.
Whichever you prefer. You won't get into trouble if you've followed authoritative advice.
You will if you have willfully or incompetently misread the authoritative advice.
There is nothing to indicate that the swa is going outside the shed.
Indeed not, which is why I said the SWA
probably means outside cabling. And be honest - it does, doesn't it....
All diyer83 says is that he intends to connect a new cu to the existing supply with swa. The existing supply may well terminate in the shed. If he were running the supply from outside I would expect him to say he was taking it from the house's cu, not from an existing supply.
Not from the existing supply as in supply to the house?
But even if you are right you won't find the installation of a length of SWA to feed a new CU in the list of non-notifiable work....
That implies it's already in the shed.
If there were to be a poll I don't think you'd find many people agreeing with your inference.