- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,610
- Reaction score
- 552
- Country
As long as will be required. Nothing in your quoted link seems particularly alarming.
I could explain about NHS precription services, drug tariff etc, but why don't you just tell me the specific point that you think i'll fall down on and then we can discuss it.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but most of the arguments about what will go wrong and what won't work don't allow for the government and associated agencies changing the way they operate of things start to fail.
I appreciate that in normal circumstances, government and bureaucracy is slow to change. But in the even of a no deal brexit, flexibility is being planned for and allowed for in advance.
The government is making plans, as they should, but they also expect things to change and for unforseen events to take place that will require adaptions.
if the plans are so great why not publish them or failing that even publish a watered down version - yes because it would cause alarm at the level of unpreparedness.
As to isotopes -do we have an agreement in place with Euratom?
http://www.scientistsforeu.uk/medical_radioisotopes_nodeal
The European Association of Nuclear Medicine is also a member of the European Observatory alongside the ESA. Their President-elect, Professor Win Oyen, has warned that although no disruption is sought, “the danger is that, if there is no agreement, people retreat to formal legal positions because there is a vacuum in regulation.”
“The transport of isotopes across borders is regulated, so it is not something you can send in a package with DHL or FedEx and expect to be delivered the next day,” Professor Oyen said in reference to the inevitable formation of a UK-EU border.
Its willfull ignorance and so how much mortality you are willing to bear is a fair question.
Last edited: