Notch 7 your ignored I can't see your posts

[gasbanni]

To me they're not worth reading.


It's done byeeee.

 

[Notch7]

Thats funny

Brexiteers on here are all triggered
Bless them

Gasbanni is so upset by posts which contain facts he has to make them hidden.

 

[noseall]

Thats funny

Brexiteers on here are all triggered
Bless them

Gasbanni is so upset by posts which contain facts he has to make them hidden.

He claimed to have me on ignore but then inadvertently looked at my posts. Incredibly dumb, even for a quitter.

 

[Notch7]

He claimed to have me on ignore but then inadvertently looked at my posts. Incredibly dumb, even for a quitter.

Isnt it a bit childish putting someone on ignore

 

[noseall]

Isnt it a bit childish putting someone on ignore

Yes. I confess having tried it for a while only to get posts confused due to missing content. I can disregard any of transams posts easily and effortlessly without the need to waste energy on clicking buttons etc.

 

[EddieM]

I feel the use of triggered is getting irritating, it's triggering me, goes in the GD box of:-

Straw man
Ad hominem
Narrative
what aboutery

And other such w@nk. Just write in plain English, rather than pseudo intelligence.

 

[Iamchamps]

I ignored it also last week as it told me everything they say is FACT

You can’t just come out with crap like that when having a debate just means you are an idiot

 

[Notch7]

triggered

It is an accurate descriotion.

Irritated means something different.

Straw man
Ad hominem
Narrative
what aboutery

Strawman, Ad hominem, whataboutery are all examples of dishonest debating techniques.

Narrative is just a word in common use.

And other such w@nk. Just write in plain English, rather than pseudo intelligence.

It is not pseudo intelligence to use the correct words for their intended use.

Heres an idea: instead why dont you get irritated by the endless logical fallacies that some on here use to avoid being honest with themselves.


What this thread is all about is that Gasbanni can't face seeing posts that disagreed with his view on Brexit.

In order to cope with it he has decided he needs to make posts invisible to him that dont supported his bias.
If he was capable of mature discussion, he would provide an intelligent counter argument instead decsending into childish insults.

 

[EddieM]

It is an accurate descriotion.

Irritated means something different.



Strawman, Ad hominem, whataboutery are all examples of dishonest debating techniques.

Narrative is just a word in common use.



It is not pseudo intelligence to use the correct words for their intended use.

Heres an idea: instead why dont you get irritated by the endless logical fallacies that some on here use to avoid being honest with themselves.


What this thread is all about is that Gasbanni can't face seeing posts that disagreed with his view on Brexit.

In order to cope with it he has decided he needs to make posts invisible to him that dont supported his bias.
If he was capable of mature discussion, he would provide an intelligent counter argument instead decsending into childish insults.

Here's another idea, shut up. Why don't you focus your concerns about the brexit shambles on somewhere where it might make an iota of difference rather than a DIY advice forum, where it makes the square foot of sod all difference?

 

[sodthisforfun]

Straw man
Ad hominem
Narrative
what aboutery

And other such w@nk. Just write in plain English, rather than pseudo intelligence.

I don't think my mates say things like that when discussing brexit and other such stuff in a pub. So I agree, it does come over as pretentious wan k.

To me they're not worth reading.


It's done byeeee.

How utterly childish.
Fine, stick someone on ignore but start a whole thread about it? What you after, a pat on the back?

 

[Notch7]

Here's another idea, shut up

Bless

People like Gasbanni, Durhamplumber and others are quite happy to post their ill informed soundbites on here endlessly.
You dont complain about that.

You complain about the person that questions what they write and holds them to account.

If those people dont want Brexit discussions from creeping into other thread topics, they should desist from posting snide comments.
But as usual, they go off topic, but I get the blame because I dont allow the comment to stand.


I agree there should be a total ban on other threads topics being diverted into brexit -perhaps we should all agree in GD that brexit must remain within threads with Brexit titles.

 

[sodthisforfun]

Apologies, misread.

It is an accurate descriotion.

Irritated means something different.



Strawman, Ad hominem, whataboutery are all examples of dishonest debating techniques.

Narrative is just a word in common use.



It is not pseudo intelligence to use the correct words for their intended use.

Heres an idea: instead why dont you get irritated by the endless logical fallacies that some on here use to avoid being honest with themselves.


What this thread is all about is that Gasbanni can't face seeing posts that disagreed with his view on Brexit.

In order to cope with it he has decided he needs to make posts invisible to him that dont supported his bias.
If he was capable of mature discussion, he would provide an intelligent counter argument instead decsending into childish insults.

However, this indeed sounds like Himmy in a nutshell. 'Fallacies', 'bias' and the last line... 100% Patronising.

You're presuming a lot about his meaning of putting you on ignore and yet it could just be a simple fact that he finds you boring.

 

[gasbanni]

Yes. I confess having tried it for a while only to get posts confused due to missing content. I can disregard any of transams posts easily and effortlessly without the need to waste energy on clicking buttons etc.

You were on ignore then I thought I'd give you a second chance and unigore you .....but your as boring and predictable as ever ....no real wit, no repartee worthy of engaging in so thus time it's permanent.

 

[gasbanni]

I don't think my mates say things like that when discussing brexit and other such stuff in a pub. So I agree, it does come over as pretentious wan k.



How utterly childish.
Fine, stick someone on ignore but start a whole thread about it? What you after, a pat on the back?

Childish not really I didn't do it out of pique, I did it purely so I don't see his drivel or make the mistake of curiously reading his nonsense.

Not really I was informing notch 7 ...not you. Do you get it ? I was telling notch 7. It would save him posting for my attention.

 

[sodthisforfun]

Not really I was informing notch 7 ...not you. Do you get it ? I was telling notch 7.

Then send him a message.
By starting a whole post about it is childish, and so is then complaining if anyone else comments about it when you've informed EVERYONE on here.

Do you get it? Do you really?
Do you really think Notch or anyone else cares?