Oh dear Oh dear

Joined
7 Jan 2007
Messages
8,831
Reaction score
1,230
Country
United Kingdom
Methinks there's just too many examples for it to be fake over too long a period of time.

So men and dinosaurs aren't supposed to be contemporaneous

http://s8int.com/phile/page56.html

and what about this ?

The Antikythera Mechanism
http://s8int.com/page5.html

I knew from reading whitcombe and morris that giant human fossilized footprints had been found, Looking for that I found this website
apart from the histrionics there appears to be some puzzling things thats been found, it may be that with your personal belief agenda its easier to dismiss it as fraud than than question or research the names of people cited as for me I'll delve a little deeper
 
Sponsored Links
Interesting stuff. Conventional religion and science think they have all the answers when they clearly don't, and anyone who dares to look out from their "box" and go for a paradigm shift in beliefs is usually ostracised and met with derision and career suicide, and there's plenty of know-it-alls on GD who'll happily "debunk" any theory you have with their own limited knowledge/programming, no matter how it flies in the face of believable truth.
Who's to say we haven't existed on this planet many times over as a civilisation for example? maybe destroying ourselves entirely and/or being destroyed by forces beyond our control?
Along with our stupidity "mankind" exhibits a frightening naivety and arrogance that we are the be all and end all of creation...we could be sh*te on someone's shoes in a universe we really have no idea what size...
What you're reading there has more in common with Lloyd Pye's Intervention Theory than it does evolution/creationism, but on a much much larger timespan. But that's my opinion only, and opinions are like as5holes, everyone has one...
 
That is an interesting site. I've bookmarked it to read now and again as there are too many pages

In summary though, is the author a creationist or evolutionist or just a loon?

Until I get the gist of the site, i find myself clicking around the web for confirmation
 
It is an interesting site and I've looked at either this one or one very similiar before. I get the impression the site leans towards creationism and trys to discredit evolution.
Concerning the "footprint" in the first link , there does seem to be a complete disregard for the "ancient astronauts" idea. It's assumed that the print must be human and nowhere as far as I can see is there any suggestion that it's the footprint of an alien :!: , just as plausable to the scientfic view.
Still as said deserves looking a bit deeper.
 
Sponsored Links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism

It would seem that things have been found which are not easily explained if the timeline of the advancement of civilization and evolution are true,

The sites are creationist sites its true, but if some of the objects are genuine
then it throws a bit of a spanner in the works.

I've only just found the sites googled some of the stuff and names and its checking out ............so its a bit puzzling.

The old map which shows the antartica outline under the ice, which has since been proved true with satellite surveys ?????

Its similar to the van daniken stuff but unlike his books this can be checked out.
 
Back
Top