I have an ole 1 pipe system which is performing quite poorly downstairs. The issues are the lounge and hall take a long time to heat up. I'd also like to add a small rad to a downstairs loo.
The system is sketched in the attached. The area under the red box is inaccessible due to wood flooring / tiles.
My proposed modifications to the system are in the 2nd attachment. These are:
1) Drop another flow and return from upstairs to feed the hall rad and the new one in the downstairs loo. This will be done as a 2 pipe branch rather than 1 pipe! I'll probably do this in 15mm copper unless there is a good reason not to? Distance is around 3m each way, and around 3Kw, so I think 15mm should be OK?
2) remove the bypass under the lounge rad to improve it's performance, essentially making the lounge a 2-pipe system too (at least sort-of, in that all the flow will have passed through a radiator before going back to the boiler).
I understand the issue with point 2 is that if the lounge TRV activates, the other 2 dining room rads will also go off, but I think this is an acceptable price to pay in order to get some heat in the lounge, and I'll probably just remove the lounge TRV as it is always on max anyway.
The boiler is a 30KW condensing combi, so I'd also perhaps expect a little efficiency improvement too by removing the bypass?
My question is, does the proposed changes seem reasonable, and do I need to be weary of any other factors (I understand it will need re-balancing)?
Thanks!
Current layout:
Proposed layout:
Current:
The system is sketched in the attached. The area under the red box is inaccessible due to wood flooring / tiles.
My proposed modifications to the system are in the 2nd attachment. These are:
1) Drop another flow and return from upstairs to feed the hall rad and the new one in the downstairs loo. This will be done as a 2 pipe branch rather than 1 pipe! I'll probably do this in 15mm copper unless there is a good reason not to? Distance is around 3m each way, and around 3Kw, so I think 15mm should be OK?
2) remove the bypass under the lounge rad to improve it's performance, essentially making the lounge a 2-pipe system too (at least sort-of, in that all the flow will have passed through a radiator before going back to the boiler).
I understand the issue with point 2 is that if the lounge TRV activates, the other 2 dining room rads will also go off, but I think this is an acceptable price to pay in order to get some heat in the lounge, and I'll probably just remove the lounge TRV as it is always on max anyway.
The boiler is a 30KW condensing combi, so I'd also perhaps expect a little efficiency improvement too by removing the bypass?
My question is, does the proposed changes seem reasonable, and do I need to be weary of any other factors (I understand it will need re-balancing)?
Thanks!
Current layout:
Proposed layout:
Current: