A work colleague has just had his vehicle towed away as it was parked across a dropped curb (leading to a house). This vehicle was parked WITHIN a marked area allowing parking.
We have been told by parking enforcement that this is rule 27, I cannot find this.
Apparently the law was changed in 2003 stating that if a vehicle was parked across a dropped curb & a complaint is made regarding an obstruction the vehicle could be removed.
This seems strange to allow parking, but if a complaint is made then the vehicle is removed. If there is no complaint the vehicle is LEGAL.
What makes this unfair if this is true, is that if YOU have a dropped curb allowing you access to your front garden for parking & you also park on the dropped curb you are given in theory an extra allocated parking bay.
I welcome any views or links to the rules.
We have been told by parking enforcement that this is rule 27, I cannot find this.
Apparently the law was changed in 2003 stating that if a vehicle was parked across a dropped curb & a complaint is made regarding an obstruction the vehicle could be removed.
This seems strange to allow parking, but if a complaint is made then the vehicle is removed. If there is no complaint the vehicle is LEGAL.
What makes this unfair if this is true, is that if YOU have a dropped curb allowing you access to your front garden for parking & you also park on the dropped curb you are given in theory an extra allocated parking bay.
I welcome any views or links to the rules.