Hello
My PD application for two single story rear extensions has been rejected, due to the 100mm gap between the two single stories not considered big enough by the LPA. They have based their decision on an example of an appeal which lost due to a 25mm gap (a quarter of the size in comparison). I have asked the LPA to define what they consider to be an acceptable gap and each time they’ve failed to provide an answer.
I have decided to appeal this and in support of my case was wondering if anyone has had experience of this or if anyone has appeal references that have won cases based on gaps 100mm or less.
Many thanks.
My PD application for two single story rear extensions has been rejected, due to the 100mm gap between the two single stories not considered big enough by the LPA. They have based their decision on an example of an appeal which lost due to a 25mm gap (a quarter of the size in comparison). I have asked the LPA to define what they consider to be an acceptable gap and each time they’ve failed to provide an answer.
I have decided to appeal this and in support of my case was wondering if anyone has had experience of this or if anyone has appeal references that have won cases based on gaps 100mm or less.
Many thanks.