Ok, i'm getting increasingly confused by this situation.
We are wanting to build a single storey rear extension on our 1940's terrace. It will be 4m high at the house end, 3m high at the eaves, 3m deep and span the width of the property.
To me it seems fairly simple that this is is allowed within a permitted development.
However, I keep getting conflicting information about whether to go for a LDC. Personally I would rather not (on time not cost grounds) unless it is looking necessary. From checking and reading every planning thing I can and looking at the Planning Portal there doesn't seem to be an issue.
I thought the point of an LDC was so that you could prove to a solicitor when selling your house that the extension had been built as a "permitted development". But a few things I've read suggest that it is so the council can determine whether it is lawful or not? But it seems blatantly obvious it is. And if it isn't with something as straight forward as this then why do we even have PD?!
My neighbours are not keen on the idea at all and while we've tried to appease them by changing the design a little, there isn't much that can be done about it. I don't want to end up wasting 2 months going for an LDC when it apparently doesn't need one and give them the chance to object and slow things down (even though I can't see that they can object anyway!) I going to go along to speak to the council planning officer tomorrow if I get a chance for a 'pre application' chat with the duty planning officer. But even then I can see them just saying if I want a definitive answer apply for a LDC - and verbal advice is never going to hold up if it needs to anyway!
All this to replace a similar (albeit smaller) conservatory...
Advice and experiences welcome!
TIA
We are wanting to build a single storey rear extension on our 1940's terrace. It will be 4m high at the house end, 3m high at the eaves, 3m deep and span the width of the property.
To me it seems fairly simple that this is is allowed within a permitted development.
However, I keep getting conflicting information about whether to go for a LDC. Personally I would rather not (on time not cost grounds) unless it is looking necessary. From checking and reading every planning thing I can and looking at the Planning Portal there doesn't seem to be an issue.
I thought the point of an LDC was so that you could prove to a solicitor when selling your house that the extension had been built as a "permitted development". But a few things I've read suggest that it is so the council can determine whether it is lawful or not? But it seems blatantly obvious it is. And if it isn't with something as straight forward as this then why do we even have PD?!
My neighbours are not keen on the idea at all and while we've tried to appease them by changing the design a little, there isn't much that can be done about it. I don't want to end up wasting 2 months going for an LDC when it apparently doesn't need one and give them the chance to object and slow things down (even though I can't see that they can object anyway!) I going to go along to speak to the council planning officer tomorrow if I get a chance for a 'pre application' chat with the duty planning officer. But even then I can see them just saying if I want a definitive answer apply for a LDC - and verbal advice is never going to hold up if it needs to anyway!
All this to replace a similar (albeit smaller) conservatory...
Advice and experiences welcome!
TIA