.... If I use my existing wiring, am I correct in saying I do not need a permanent live to PIR as the switch will be left on?
I'm not sure what you mean by "the existing wiring", given that you said that you had just bought the lights and PIR, and asked about how you could wire them.
You
DO need a 'permanent live' to the PIR (to connect to the 'input' of the PIR). In this context, "permanent live" means that, when the PIR is being used, that remains live all the time, even when the PIR has not switched the lights on (the lights are fed from the 'switched live', aka 'output', of the PIR).
There are two ways you could do that. Firstly, if you did
not want the 'manual over-ride' option just described by TTC, then you could could run a 2-core cable ('permanent live' and neutral) from the house/switches to the PIR, and then 2 core cable (PIR-switched live {from PIR 'output') and neutral) from the PIR to the chain of lights. However, that would involve a separate cable all the way from the house to the 'distant' PIR - which I thought was what you wanted to avoid.
Secondly, as bernard, TTC and myself have said, if you used 3-core cable ('permanent live'. 'PIR-switched live' and neutral) for 'everything' (from the house [the switch(es)], from PIR to one light, and between the lights), then you could take such a cable from house to first light, then between each of the lights and hence to the PIR at the end of the run (hence just the one cable, without the need for a separate cable from house for PIR) - and that would also enable you to have the 'manual over-ride' facility as shown by TTC. The 'permanent live' would just 'pass through' each of the lights (not connected to anything at lights - and therefore would need some sort of 'connector block' if you cut the cable at each light) and would only be connected to the ('input' of the) PIR at the end of the run.
Kind Regards, John