- Joined
- 10 Oct 2016
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
Hi - we had a planning application in with haringey to build across our side return and add a 3rd bedroom above the kitchen. The council weren't particularly enthusiastic about the bedroom but we discussed how we could go about it, modelled light angles to neighbours windows etc. By the end our planner visited the property and told us he was looking for an approval but needed to check with management as there was a dispute with a house further up the street where a developer knocked the house down and did a major re-build without any planning. He needed to know if there would be an impact from that (this was a conversation only so no record).
We got an email soon after to tell us the bedroom aspect of our planning would be rejected as it set an unwelcome precedent (happy to share full text). This was a real surprise and it appears they didn't want to approve it in case it complicated the separate case they had up the road. It then took another 5 or so months before the rejection actually came through and I noticed it only arrived once the retrospective appeal on the other house had been rejected. I challenged the planner on why our decision had been impacted and influenced by a separate case and he simply flat batted everything away. Suddenly he was given us a tough line and had clearly been instructed to do so.
We've pushed on with the ground floor under permitted development and have done the structure to support the bedroom with a view to appealing. I am concerned that I am in an unfamiliar and seemingly slightly murky world where the council can reference planning policy at their subjective convenience. Some advice on next steps would be greatly appreciated. I don't want this to become too long a post but would love some views on how I can inform myself on the best way forward, I'm very uncomfortable with how this has run and it seems that things are far from black and white. Some key considerations:
The address is 29 warberry road and the house under dispute is 45 warberry road N22
Thanks! Andy
We got an email soon after to tell us the bedroom aspect of our planning would be rejected as it set an unwelcome precedent (happy to share full text). This was a real surprise and it appears they didn't want to approve it in case it complicated the separate case they had up the road. It then took another 5 or so months before the rejection actually came through and I noticed it only arrived once the retrospective appeal on the other house had been rejected. I challenged the planner on why our decision had been impacted and influenced by a separate case and he simply flat batted everything away. Suddenly he was given us a tough line and had clearly been instructed to do so.
We've pushed on with the ground floor under permitted development and have done the structure to support the bedroom with a view to appealing. I am concerned that I am in an unfamiliar and seemingly slightly murky world where the council can reference planning policy at their subjective convenience. Some advice on next steps would be greatly appreciated. I don't want this to become too long a post but would love some views on how I can inform myself on the best way forward, I'm very uncomfortable with how this has run and it seems that things are far from black and white. Some key considerations:
- We live in a mid terrace in Haringey
- Whilst there are no first floor bedroom extensions on our part (other than the one on the house subject to the council dispute) the backs of all houses and add on parts (lean tos etc) are a hotch potch all the way along
- There are a number of varying first story extensions on the opposite side of the street and surrounding streets (the council told me rules changed 6 years ago so none could be taken as setting any sort of precedent? Again seems strange that in one swoop all precedents are wiped out)
- There appear to be no significant concerns with light impact to neighbours due to the windows angles and the direction on the back of the house
- Our planning was the maximum we wanted at 3m and in the end there was no offer to discuss a compromise to our plans
- Our planning app had no objections
- Our architect and builder were both very surprised it was rejected
The address is 29 warberry road and the house under dispute is 45 warberry road N22
Thanks! Andy