Hi. Can anyone help me? I am concerned about a quote an old lady has had for sound proofing a house and wondered if anyone with appropriate knowledge can advise if this is normal?
Essentially old, but attempting to be independent old lady owns a small 2 bed house and converts them into in to 2 flats (top floor is a small 1 bed flat, ground floor is small studio flat). Photos attached are of top floor to give appreciation of size.
She pays a builder to convert them. Builder introduces old lady to his “friend” a middle aged man who does odd jobs for her. Builder is paid cash and moves on but “friend” has tea with her and continues to be paid cash to do adhoc jobs.
A few years later, old lady decides to sell the flats. During sale it comes to light building regs not checked during conversion.
The “friend” helps her, meets building regs from council. They state sound proofing is required. He is paid to do this, which he does and then meets again with building regs man to re-check.
Following this “friend” states that sound proofing has failed again and will be £10,000 to fix. He states this is for 18mm ply on floor on top flat, suspended ceiling and sound proofing stairs. “friend” also now denies knowing the original builder any more so conveniently he can’t go back to him. She is considering paying him cash again to do this
I know no more details than this, but to me this appears pretty expensive for sound proofing between 2 very small flats. Does anyone have any experience of this? Is this potentially a fair quote (I don’t want to rock the boat if it is). There have been other issues suggesting “friend” is taking advantage. Any advice would be appreciated.
Essentially old, but attempting to be independent old lady owns a small 2 bed house and converts them into in to 2 flats (top floor is a small 1 bed flat, ground floor is small studio flat). Photos attached are of top floor to give appreciation of size.
She pays a builder to convert them. Builder introduces old lady to his “friend” a middle aged man who does odd jobs for her. Builder is paid cash and moves on but “friend” has tea with her and continues to be paid cash to do adhoc jobs.
A few years later, old lady decides to sell the flats. During sale it comes to light building regs not checked during conversion.
The “friend” helps her, meets building regs from council. They state sound proofing is required. He is paid to do this, which he does and then meets again with building regs man to re-check.
Following this “friend” states that sound proofing has failed again and will be £10,000 to fix. He states this is for 18mm ply on floor on top flat, suspended ceiling and sound proofing stairs. “friend” also now denies knowing the original builder any more so conveniently he can’t go back to him. She is considering paying him cash again to do this
I know no more details than this, but to me this appears pretty expensive for sound proofing between 2 very small flats. Does anyone have any experience of this? Is this potentially a fair quote (I don’t want to rock the boat if it is). There have been other issues suggesting “friend” is taking advantage. Any advice would be appreciated.