Next year I need to get my lounge window and back door replaced. Both are showing quite severe signs of age. The rest of my windows are fine (1 x kitchen, 1 x dining room, 1 x bathroom, 2 x bedroom) and don't need replaced as such.
However, over the years I've heard people say the quote difference between getting a portion of your house done vs the whole house isn't always that significant, obviously depending on house size and no. of doors and windows.
Is there any truth in this? I'm not fully settled in this house and will likely move x years down the line, so I'm not looking to outlay significant sums of money on it. So the thought of keeping costs as low as possible appeals.
Yes, at the time I can obviously get various quotes to compare, however I just wondered if anyone on here with experience/knowledge of the double glazing industry had any views on this?
However, over the years I've heard people say the quote difference between getting a portion of your house done vs the whole house isn't always that significant, obviously depending on house size and no. of doors and windows.
Is there any truth in this? I'm not fully settled in this house and will likely move x years down the line, so I'm not looking to outlay significant sums of money on it. So the thought of keeping costs as low as possible appeals.
Yes, at the time I can obviously get various quotes to compare, however I just wondered if anyone on here with experience/knowledge of the double glazing industry had any views on this?