Hello,
I have about 38sq.m of floor to tile. It's currently an anhydrite screed with wet underfloor heating in it. It was poured 5.5 weeks ago. A week ago I started gradually warming up the underfloor heating, and switched it off this morning. I'm hoping to tile it tomorrow - the floor should be cold again by then.
The screed is about 60mm thick. I'm hoping the often-quoted "1mm per day drying time" has been reduced by the underfloor heating being switched on. There are no cracks in the screed.
My question is regarding laitance, which I didn't know anything about until this morning, when researching primers. I have read that the top layer (insert random thickness here) needs to be removed to get down to the screed with a decent amount of strength. The floor seems hard, not crumbly at all. It's a bit dusty, but it's not like the screed 'comes away' as dust when swept - if you know what I mean. So is this removal of the laitance really necessary? Or will I just end up with a load of cracked/unstuck tiles in a few weeks if I skip the laitance removal step?
I've read about using shot/grit blasting and all sorts of expensive-sounding methods of laitance removal, but I've also seen a video on YouTube (always a reliable source of information, I know!!) of someone apparently removing laitance using a floor sander with a coarse grit paper.
So, I'm obviously hoping that laitance removal is overkill - the room is a sitting room/kitchen, so won't get a huge amount of moisture/traffic, but obviously the underfloor heating will add some movement to the whole equation.
Any thoughts or experience of this, anyone, please?
Many thanks in advance!
- Paul
I have about 38sq.m of floor to tile. It's currently an anhydrite screed with wet underfloor heating in it. It was poured 5.5 weeks ago. A week ago I started gradually warming up the underfloor heating, and switched it off this morning. I'm hoping to tile it tomorrow - the floor should be cold again by then.
The screed is about 60mm thick. I'm hoping the often-quoted "1mm per day drying time" has been reduced by the underfloor heating being switched on. There are no cracks in the screed.
My question is regarding laitance, which I didn't know anything about until this morning, when researching primers. I have read that the top layer (insert random thickness here) needs to be removed to get down to the screed with a decent amount of strength. The floor seems hard, not crumbly at all. It's a bit dusty, but it's not like the screed 'comes away' as dust when swept - if you know what I mean. So is this removal of the laitance really necessary? Or will I just end up with a load of cracked/unstuck tiles in a few weeks if I skip the laitance removal step?
I've read about using shot/grit blasting and all sorts of expensive-sounding methods of laitance removal, but I've also seen a video on YouTube (always a reliable source of information, I know!!) of someone apparently removing laitance using a floor sander with a coarse grit paper.
So, I'm obviously hoping that laitance removal is overkill - the room is a sitting room/kitchen, so won't get a huge amount of moisture/traffic, but obviously the underfloor heating will add some movement to the whole equation.
Any thoughts or experience of this, anyone, please?
Many thanks in advance!
- Paul