I have a Victorian brick-built workshop/outbuilding on my property (probably used originally for keeping a pony & trap) with what was probably originally a hayloft above. It's a smallish building with a footprint of approx 4x5 m but it's very damp due to the ground level being built up to a considerable height behind the building and I've recently discovered dry rot in the joists for the loft area. I've decided that my best plan of action would be to tear it down and replace with a new building. I had thought that converting into some liveable extra accommodation would add value to the house and an architect mentioned a live/work space, granny annex etc. Having done a bit of googling I've realised that, from a point of view of rates & council tax, both of these options would cost me more in the long term and the live/work space is entirely unsuitable for my needs (I go out to work and don't work from home!!)
One option might be to rebuild the outbuilding to a habitable standard from a point of view of building regs etc but not apply for a change of use at this time. Would this be a legal and viable option? To make best use of the first floor an increase in the height of the building at the front would benefit but I am in a conservation area and I think that might prove tricky. If that was not possible then a galleried area in the rear portion of the building would have to suffice (the roof slopes from the back to the front) but would limit options in the future. I would also like to install a toilet and shower in the building and I don't know how this sits with planners with regards to change of use etc.
I will also seek alternative advice from sources other than the architect already mentioned as perhaps engaging an architect for such a small project is overkill and I only have a limited budget and his quoted fees seemed quite high.
Any advice would be most welcome.
One option might be to rebuild the outbuilding to a habitable standard from a point of view of building regs etc but not apply for a change of use at this time. Would this be a legal and viable option? To make best use of the first floor an increase in the height of the building at the front would benefit but I am in a conservation area and I think that might prove tricky. If that was not possible then a galleried area in the rear portion of the building would have to suffice (the roof slopes from the back to the front) but would limit options in the future. I would also like to install a toilet and shower in the building and I don't know how this sits with planners with regards to change of use etc.
I will also seek alternative advice from sources other than the architect already mentioned as perhaps engaging an architect for such a small project is overkill and I only have a limited budget and his quoted fees seemed quite high.
Any advice would be most welcome.